THE office of South Korean president Moon Jae-in has announced it will launch a review on the country’s 64-year-old abortion ban law.
The announcement came after more than 230,000 South Koreans signed a petition calling for the abolishment of the law.
South Korea made abortion illegal in 1953 when its leaders wanted to boost the population and build an army powerful enough to fend off its rival North Korea.
But in 1973, with population growth strong, the government created exceptions to the abortion law, such as where the mother’s health is at risk, the baby is to be born with severe birth defects or the pregnancy was caused by a sexual crime.
Many South Korean public health experts pushed for changes in the abortion law but faced opposition from a strong pro-life lobby in a country with one of Asia’s largest percentages of Christians and a government trying to boost one of the world’s lowest fertility rates.
The president’s office said the government will conduct research next year on the country’s abortion cases for the first time since 2010.
“Based on the outcome from the research, we expect to move relevant discussions one step forward,” Cho Kuk, the senior presidential secretary for civil affairs, said in a statement.
Cho said South Korea’s constitutional court, which in 2012 upheld the anti-abortion law, will again review the legislation
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here