NICOLA Sturgeon accused Ruth Davidson of spreading “misinformation” over the snagging work needed on the Queensferry Crossing.
In a heated exchange at First Minister’s Questions, the Tory leader said the SNP chief had pushed through the opening of the bridge in the summer, claiming it “as a symbol of Scottish National Party competence”.
But now that there seemed to be a problem, she added, the government was passing the buck.
Work started late last night on “identified snagging work” and is due to finish by 6am on Wednesday December 6. Traffic heading towards Edinburgh will be forced to use the old Forth Road Bridge.
Earlier in the week MSPs were told surfacing problems on the southbound carriageway of the £1.35 billion bridge were caused by a workmanship error.
The contract allows for snagging works to take place up until next September.
Davidson told the Scottish Parliament: “In September, it was job done and pats on the back all round but, on Monday, we were told that another five days of work would be needed. Yesterday, those five days became another 10 months of possible disruption.
“Does the First Minister not see that it is the dripping out of that kind of information rather than simply levelling with people that is damaging the public’s trust?” Davidson asked.
Sturgeon pointed out that Davidson’s colleagues had complained “bitterly” when the bridge’s opening was delayed by 10 weeks.
She added: “Anybody who has ever moved into a new house knows that snagging is required on construction projects. There is snagging work to be done.
“The project director told Parliament in June that there would be a period of three to six months of snagging work. That is being carried out.”
The SNP leader said it was “completely and utterly inaccurate” for Davidson to say five days had become 10 months.
It would only be this immediate work that required daytime and peak-time lane closures.
If other work requires lane closures, they will be closed at night, the First Minister promised, adding that all further work would be done in a way that “minimises inconvenience” to the public.
There was also some disagreement about when the Scottish Government knew the bridge would have to be closed.
Transport Scotland told a Holyrood committee that issues with road surfacing were known about in August – before the crossing’s opening – but a solution was not found until a “couple of weeks’’ ago.
Sturgeon said ministers were only alerted a week ago.
Scottish Liberal Democrat leader Willie Rennie, in whose North East Fife constituency the bridge lies, was sceptical about the need for such major snagging work.
“Who spends more than a billion pounds on a bridge then closes it weeks later?” he asked.
People who depend on the bridge over the Forth have been commendably patient, Rennie argued, but “this is now the third Christmas of disruption”.
Sturgeon rubbished this, saying the lane closures would be over by the first week in December.
“Let us stop mis-characterising what is happening,” she said.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel