THE judge leading the Grenfell Tower public inquiry has rejected calls that he ask the Prime Minister for the probe to be overhauled.
Sir Martin Moore-Bick had faced pressure to discuss with Theresa May the possibility that a panel from a diverse range of backgrounds sit alongside him during proceedings.
Survivors and bereaved families have lobbied for an overhaul of the inquiry's format due to lingering doubts about Sir Martin's suitability for the role.
He wrote in a letter published on Wednesday: "I am and must remain completely independent of the Government and in my view it would be wrong for me to take the initiative by advising the Prime Minister either to appoint additional members to the panel or not to do so."
Only May can authorise a change in the inquiry's format under the Inquiries Act 2005.
Organisations involved in the refurbishment and management of Grenfell Tower were also asked to provide statements about their work to the inquiry.
The retired Court of Appeal judge wrote to commercial core participants including the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (RBKC) and the Kensington and Chelsea Tenant Management Organisation (KCTMO), requesting they describe their "role" in the block's history during the five years before the fire.
It is suspected that the installation of a flammable cladding system on the 24-storey tower contributed to the spread of the June 14 inferno, which killed 71.
In a concession to those touched by the tragedy, Sir Martin said he would consider on a case-by-case basis whether their counsel could question witnesses.
His 18-page letter said it was hoped that evidence hearings could begin after Easter 2018.
RBKC owned the west London block, but it was managed on the authority's behalf by the KCTMO, an arm's-length organisation.
The KCTMO was stripped of responsibility for Kensington and Chelsea's social housing stock after the fire.
An £8.6 million refurbishment of Grenfell Tower finished in 2016, having been designed and delivered by the KCTMO and contractor Rydon.
It was alleged that the council and the KCTMO repeatedly ignored residents' warnings about fire safety.
They are being investigated by the Metropolitan Police for potential corporate manslaughter offences.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here