THEN prime minister John Major rushed out the news the Queen had agreed to pay income tax to deflect growing media criticism during her “annus horribilis”, according to newly released official files.
The year 1992 was marked by the very public breakdowns of the marriages of Charles and Diana and the Duke and Duchess of York as well as the divorce of the Princess Royal and her first husband Captain Mark Phillips. The final blow came when a fire caused extensive damage to Windsor Castle, prompting an outcry when it was suggested that the estimated £60 million repair bill should be met by the taxpayer.
With the royal family under scrutiny as never before, files released by the National Archives at Kew, west London, show the growing concern among ministers at the effect the “intrusive and intolerable” media coverage was having.
On November 26, Major finally revealed to the Cabinet the Queen, who was not subject to taxation, had asked him some months earlier to “consider arrangements by which she could pay the equivalent of income tax on her private income”.
The Prince of Wales, he said, had made a similar offer in relation to his income from the Duchy of Cornwall.
A team of officials had been quietly working on the plan, and Major told ministers that he had intended to make announcement in a few weeks, when the exercise was complete.
However, the cabinet minutes noted: “In the light of recent unjustified media criticism of the Queen’s taxation position and after discussion with Her Majesty, he had decided to tell Parliament later that day that these discussions were taking place and also that the Queen proposed to take on some Civil List payments.”
In the discussion that followed, ministers agreed the move was “most welcome” and should put a stop to one of the major sources of criticism of the royal family.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here