ESTHER McVey's appointment as Work and Pensions Secretary is a "cause for alarm" for disabled people, Jeremy Corbyn believes, but the Labour leader condemned online abuse aimed at the new Tory Cabinet minister.
McVey became an unpopular figure while a minister at the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) under David Cameron.
Shadow chancellor John McDonnell described McVey as "a stain of inhumanity" during an outburst in the Commons in March 2015.
Her return to the DWP - this time as its senior minister - led to a series of critical messages on social media.
Twitter user Red Forever, who claims to be a Labour member, branded McVey a "murderess" and said she was "back to finish off her job of killing the sick and disabled".
A spokesman for Corbyn said: "Esther McVey is extremely unpopular because of her record in the last government as a DWP minister and the treatment of disabled people under that government.
"It is not encouraging at all, it is alarming that she has now taken on this role with all the baggage that goes with that."
But he added: "Jeremy has made clear time and again he is opposed to all forms of online harassment or abuse. If there are such cases then that obviously should not take place."
Asked if Corbyn viewed her as a "stain on humanity", the spokesman said: "Jeremy is also highly critical of her record and her appointment is a cause for alarm and will be for disabled people in particular, but people across the country."
Shadow foreign secretary Emily Thornberry told BBC Radio 5 Live: "I think that those who remember what it was that she said around the time that she was cutting benefits to disabled people will be horrified to hear that she is now the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions."
It was "wrong" for her to receive death threats on social media but "what she needs to do is she needs to ensure that she educates herself properly about what the effects of cuts to benefits have on real people on a day-to-day basis".
Pressed on McDonnell's 2015 comments, Thornberry said: "I would never talk about anybody else like that."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here