SCOTTISH Greens have set out their Budget red lines ahead of crucial negotiations with Finance Secretary Derek Mackay.
With the SNP no longer having a majority at Holyrood, ministers will have to seek the support of other parties if tax and spending plans for 2018-19 are to be approved.
The six Green MSPs, who backed the Government in the Budget vote last year, are seen as the most likely candidates for this.
But as the draft Budget for 2018-19 continues through the Scottish Parliament, Green co-convener Patrick Harvie has said there are three key tests Mackay will have to meet to win his party's backing.
The Green MSP said: "If the Government come back before January 31 with a revised Budget that does not meet these three tests, we will be unable to give our support.
"The investment we seek will deliver a fairer, greener Scotland, and ministers know these are the right choices to make."
Scottish Greens insist they will not vote for the Budget if it cuts local government spending, citing analysis by the Scottish Parliament Information Centre (Spice) as showing councils could be left £157 million worse off.
Public sector pay is another priority area where the Greens want the Scottish Government to commit more cash.
In his draft Budget Mackay set out that only those workers earning under £30,000 would receive a 3 per cent wage rise, while higher earners would get a lower rise which the Greens said amounted to a "real terms pay cut".
Meanwhile council workers will not automatically benefit from the Scottish Government's new public pay policy, with local government having to fund any increases staff receive.
The third key demand is for more investment to help tackle climate change, with Greens urging that low carbon projects receive greater spending.
It comes after the SNP and the Greens voted together at Holyrood to pass a motion calling for the Budget to "protect public services, fund a fair pay increase for public sector workers and invest in low-carbon infrastructure".
Harvie said: "The ball is in the Scottish Government's court. We have made very clear over recent months what our priorities are and where their draft Budget is lacking, and SNP ministers and backbenchers were last week left with no option but to acknowledge this by supporting our position in Parliament.
"The investment we seek is to protect schools and other local services, help frontline staff doing vital jobs to catch up after years of erosion in their pay packets, and it's about building the new rail lines, better buses and affordable housing that Scotland desperately needs."
The Scottish Government wants to use its Budget to raise extra cash, with changes proposed for income tax in Scotland.
Under the current proposals while Scots earning between £33,000 and £43,000 will pay more, workers on between £43,000 and £58,000 will pay less than in 2017-18.
Harvie branded this "absurd" saying his party had given ministers a range of proposals for raising additional revenue "most obviously by fixing the absurd anomaly in the proposed income tax system which cuts tax for people on high incomes".
A spokesman for Mackay said: "The SNP Government's budget has been well received, with support for our proposals to deliver fairer taxation, invest over £400m of new spending in the NHS, support new investment in education and the low carbon economy, and to ensure that workers in our NHS and other parts of the public sector receive a pay rise – whilst dealing with continued cuts to Scotland's budget from the Tory government.
"The Greens have set out their proposals, and any other party interested in serious negotiations is welcome to do the same."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel