WHAT’S THE STORY?
HIS statue has long been the subject of protest, now British military leader Lieutenant General Edward Cornwallis has been knocked off his pedestal in Canada.
The removal of the statue is a victory for Indigenous activists and their supporters in Halifax, which Cornwallis founded in his role as governor of Nova Scotia.
He later placed a bounty on the lives of Mi’kmaq men, women and children in the so-called scalping proclamation aimed at solidifying colonial power.
The Canadian posting came after the aristocrat played a key role in the Duke of Cumberland’s forces during the 1745 Jacobite Rising.
Ordered to “plunder, burn and destroy through all the west part of Invernesshire called Lochaber”, he led 320 men in a campaign to stamp out Highland resistance.
HOW DID HE END UP WITH A STATUE?
Sometimes it seems history loves nothing better than to honour violent men responsible for violent acts.
The Canadian National Railway set the tribute in a park as a tourist draw in 1931, but the controversy over its existence prompted concerns about damage to the city’s reputation, contributing to the removal decision.
On Canada Day last year an Indigenous rally at the bronze figure was the focus of tension after supporters of the statue, who identified themselves as members of the Proud Boys “western chauvinist” organisation, disrupted the event.
WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO IT NOW?
That’s unclear as yet. Following the removal on Wednesday, it will be placed in storage until a solution can be found.
The exact location has not been disclosed for fear of attracting the attention of anyone seeking to deface the sculpture.
The removal came just 24 hours after a vote by local councillors. However, that speed follows months of delay that led to frustrations on both sides of the argument.
Discussions about how best to recognise Indigenous history and deal with the colonial legacy continue.
Watching the process, one member of the Potlotek First Nation told reporters: “I feel like my ancestors can finally rest.”
WHAT’S THE WIDER CONTEXT?
The removal follows similar actions in America, where statues erected in memory of Confederate figures have been taken down and often destroyed. That process has also been controversial, with some arguing that icons of white supremacy have no place in contemporary society and others that history is being erased.
Like its southern neighbour, Canada is also reevaluating its own story, including tensions between Indigenous and settler communities.
Authorities in Montreal have removed the name from a street of one British general who wrote that he wanted to “extirpate this execrable race” of Indigenous peoples in the 1760s, while teachers in Ontario have been pushing to rename buildings named after Scottish-born prime minister Sir John A Macdonald, who led the country when the first residential schools for Indigenous children were approved.
Pupils were removed from their communities and placed in the institutions in a bid to assimilate them into Euro-Canadian culture, with siblings separated and their languages and traditions banned.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel