MARIANO Rajoy’s government is planning to end the use of the Catalan language in the state’s schools, using the unprecedented direct rule it imposed following the October independence referendum.
Spanish Education Minister Inigo Mendez de Vigo, who is also a spokesperson for the Madrid government, said yesterday: “Of course, we’ll do it,” while denying that the idea was simply being floated.
He said Madrid would guarantee “the right of parents to choose the schooling language for their children”.
One option under consideration was giving families the option of choosing Spanish as a working language on pre-enrolment forms for the next school year.
Marcial Martin, Spain’s Education Secretary, said a final decision would be made within weeks.
Catalan has been the working language in the state’s schools since self-government was restored in the 1980s and pupils complete their education with a good command of it and Spanish.
One member of Catalonia’s central public schools board yesterday described the proposal as “illegal.”
Artur Ramirez told the RAC1 radio station that Catalonia’s education law does not allow changes in the current system and said Madrid’s plan “breaks an existing consensus within the educational community”.
He said: “What do they want – to divide children between Spanish and Catalan? Dividing children for language reasons isn’t an educational measure, it is promoting differences, it is sectarian and does not help integration or cohesion.”
Deposed Catalan president, Carles Puigdemont, said Madrid was “trying to divide Catalan students for language reasons”, and former Catalan education minister, Meritxell Ruiz, claimed the law did not allow changes to the pre-enrolment system.
The unionist Socialist Party also rejected Madrid’s move.
Meritxell Batet, an MP in the Spanish Congress said: “The Catalan Socialists have never been in favour of segregating children for language reasons.”
Meanwhile, Elsa Artadi, who was thought likely favourite to fill the presidential void in the Catalan Parliament – with Puigdemont in his Brussels exile – has said she is “not a substitute” for him and was sure his case would go all the way to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in Strasbourg.
Artadi’s comments came in an interview with the Catalan News Agency (ACN) and with parliament still without a president, two months after the election.
A ruling on the legality of Puigdemont’s presidential bid – which is opposed by Madrid – has still to come from the Constitutional Court (TC).
Artadi is a close ally of Puigdemont, as well as campaign director for his Together for Catalonia (JxCat) party, and maintained that it was still possible to swear in her ally remotely.
She said: “We believe that the current regulations allow us to do this already, but the parliament president wanted more guarantees, so we’ve been working on providing these guarantees through this amendment to the law.
“The job of the parliament is to make and to amend laws, so we can’t foresee the Constitutional Court forbidding us from amending a law, because that would be very similar to closing the parliament.”
Artadi added that the ECHR would be more balanced than the Spanish courts: “Our legal team has been working on this for weeks and obviously we have to go through Strasbourg because we believe that the European judiciary is going to be way more just than the Spanish judiciary, so for sure we will be there.”
And she dismissed speculation about her becoming president: “This is a media bubble that does not come from us.
“Obviously, it doesn’t come from me. I’m no substitute for president Puigdemont,” she added.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel