SCOTTISH Tory MP Douglas Ross was accused of "not doing his homework" after his claim that soldiers serving in Scotland were being punished unfairly by tax changes was exposed as false.
Speaking in the House of Commons, Ross said: "Someone serving in Scotland at the same rank and doing the same job as someone in England will pay more tax if they earn more than just £24,000."
However, the Ferret Fact Service looked at the claim and found it to be false.
The Scottish Budget passed in February will see Scots earning between £24,000 and £43,430 moving from a tax rate of 20 per cent to 21 per cent.
With changes in areas such as the personal allowance, the Scottish Parliament Information Centre found that the amount paid by Scots earning up to £33,000 would be reduced.
SNP defence spokesperson Stewart McDonald slammed Ross after the Moray MP's claims were picked apart.
McDonald said: "For some time Douglas Ross has tried to manufacture a grievance with armed forces tax in Scotland.
"He should spend his time getting behind the SNP efforts to improve the miserable pay settlement they receive.
"This issue isn't what squaddies across the UK are talking about. They're talking about low wages, housing and pensions.
"He should address the actual issues rather than try to manufacture false accusations that he hasn't even done proper homework on."
Scottish soldiers earning up to £26,000 will pay less overall tax than their English counterparts. However, those earning over around £28,000 would pay more.
The Ferret concluded that while Ross was correct in saying some personnel will face higher income tax than in England, "the threshold at which this occurs is significantly higher than he claimed".
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel