NICOLA Sturgeon has said she is "disappointed" by the vote to scrap a controversial law aimed at tackling sectarianism at football.
Opposition parties defeated the Scottish Government by passing Labour MSP James Kelly's Bill to repeal the Offensive Behaviour at Football and Threatening Communications (Scotland) Act on Thursday.
The Act was introduced by the majority SNP government in the last parliament in the face of united opposition from all other parties.
Since coming into force in 2012, it has faced criticism from legal experts and fans' groups who claim it is unworkable and unfairly targets football fans.
Kelly's Bill - backed by the Conservatives, Labour, Liberal Democrats and the Greens - is understood to be the first passed at Holyrood with the sole purpose of repealing an Act of the Scottish Parliament and sparked concerns from opponents that it would leave vulnerable groups exposed to abuse.
Questioned on the vote to scrap the Act, the First Minister said: "I'm disappointed. I think it was a retrograde step but I understand the concerns that were expressed and parliament has taken its decision so we move on now.
"Obviously, we've had a concern about repealing the act before alternatives were in place but we've moved on from that.
"It's important that we do not lose sight of the collective need across society to have zero tolerance towards sectarianism and I hope that message, notwithstanding the vote yesterday, continues to go out very strongly."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel