LABOUR needs to "show leadership" and warn about the risks of Brexit, Owen Smith said after being dismissed from "Eurosceptic" Jeremy Corbyn's shadow cabinet.
Smith was sacked last night for calling for a second European Union referendum, leading to a backlash from Remain MPs.
And Corbyn was also facing unrest over his response to a Facebook post by street artist Mear One about the plan to paint over a mural seen as anti-Semitic.
READ MORE: Kremlin denies Russian spy Sergei Skripal asked for a pardon
Responding to the rows engulfing Labour, MP Wes Streeting said: "If only anti-Semites were dealt with as swiftly as Remainers."
Asked if the Labour leader was tough on pro-EU MPs but weak on anti-Semitism, Smith said: "Well he was certainly tough on me."
Speaking to BBC Radio 4's Today Smith said: "Jeremy Corbyn clearly wants to take a different position to that which I advocate, a more Eurosceptic position if you like, on Brexit.
"My view is that the Labour Party needs to show leadership on this issue, it's the biggest economic crisis that our country will have faced for many, many generations."
Warning of the danger that Labour could "sleepwalk" to "effectively supporting a soft Brexit", he added: "It's the first instance that I can think of in living memory of a government pursuing a policy that they know is going to make our economy smaller and reduce people's livelihoods and life chances and I cannot understand why we in Labour would support that."
He did not endorse former cabinet minister Lord Hain's view that Jeremy Corbyn was conducting a "Stalinist purge", but said he thought the leader had made a "mistake" to sack him.
Corbyn had "always understood the value of people standing by their principles, it's the position he has often adopted and it is certainly a value in him that others have extolled", Smith said.
"That's all I have done, I have stood by principles on what I think is the most important economic and security issue facing our country for generations."
Meanwhile, Commons Home Affairs Committee chairwoman Yvette Cooper added her voice to concerns about Corbyn's handling of the mural row.
In a public Facebook response to Mear One, Corbyn had questioned why the painting was being destroyed and said the artist was "in good company" because the Rockefeller family had covered over a work featuring Lenin in their New York development.
The mural, in east London, depicted a group of businessmen playing a Monopoly-style game on a board balanced on the backs of people.
The artist denied being anti-Semitic, saying the mural is about "class and privilege" and contains a group of bankers "made up of Jewish and white Anglos".
Corbyn said he made a "general comment about the removal of public art on grounds of freedom of speech" but acknowledged he should have looked more closely at the image before posting on Facebook at the time of the row in 2012.
He said: "I sincerely regret that I did not look more closely at the image I was commenting on, the contents of which are deeply disturbing and anti-Semitic."
Cooper said she was "really troubled by the mural, the comments and the way this was handled" adding "fighting anti-Semitism is strong part of our tradition and values, and Labour must be better than this".
Smith said the mural was an "appalling, monstrous work".
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel