THE Loch Ness Monster was at the centre of a debate in the House of Commons yesterday when an MP told how his uncle had claimed to have seen Nessie – only for it to be revealed at his funeral that he had made the story up.
Tory Bob Stewart said the claims by his uncle, who was at school near Loch Ness, made the newspapers and led to a tourism boom. SNP MP Drew Hendry joked that it was “a scurrilous attack on what is quite clearly one of my constituents”.
The exchange began when Hendry was outlining the growth of tourism in his Highlands constituency, saying: “Why wouldn’t you, Mr Speaker, want to come to Inverness, Nairn, Badenoch and Strathspey?
“To enjoy the snow sports in the Cairngorms, perhaps, or golfing in Nairn, or go on a cruise along Loch Ness with Jacobite cruises.”
Beckenham MP Stewart later intervened saying: “I want to help him by saying my uncle, who was at school on the edges of Loch Ness as a boy, saw the Loch Ness monster. In consequence, tourism expanded hugely. It was in all the Scottish newspapers. And only at his funeral did he allow it that he was a fake.”
Hendry joked: “I was initially grateful for his intervention, but that’s a scurrilous attack on what is quite clearly one of my constituents.”
Stewart offered further clarity on the story at the end of the debate. Government whip Paul Maynard, summing up, said: “Back to Inverness, I will have to pay a visit if only to hunt for Nessie.”
Stewart added: “For the sake of clarity, my uncle ... was at prep school alongside Loch Ness in 1931 when he was late back to school and he and another boy claimed they were watching the Loch Ness monster. This grew big and he was stuck with it.
“And it was only at my great uncle’s funeral that he allowed his son to declare that actually he hadn’t seen the Loch Ness monster all those years ago as a boy. But I want to say I believe there is a Loch Ness monster.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel