SIXTY Church of England bishops as well as senior figures from other Christian, Jewish and Muslim groups have united to urge the UK Government to rethink its controversial benefits cap on families with more than two children.
Parents can claim child tax credits or Universal Credit for only their first two children unless there are special circumstances – including if a child is conceived as a result of rape – under the so-called “two-child” policy introduced one year ago.
READ MORE: The benefits system is broken – and Holyrood can help fix it
The SNP’s Alison Thewliss has been running a campaign against the two-child limit and rape clause policy, which would force women who had conceived through rape to tell civil servants about the experience in order to qualify for the benefit.
In a letter to a daily newspaper yesterday, religious leaders warned that the policy is expected to tip an extra 200,000 children into poverty.
The letter adds: “It also conveys the regrettable message that some children matter less than others, depending on their place in the sibling birth order.
READ MORE: Tories 'caught out' over income tax claims
“It is a grave concern that there are likely to be mothers who will face an invidious choice between poverty and terminating an unplanned pregnancy.”
The letter has been signed by the new Bishop of London, the Rt Revd Sarah Mullally, as well as Harun Khan, secretary general of the Muslim Council of Britain, and Gillian Merron, chief executive of the Board of Deputies of British Jews
The two-child policy “is making it harder for parents to achieve a stable and resilient family life”, the letter said.
Many will have taken decisions about family size when they were able to support their children through work but may now be claiming benefits because of bereavement, redundancy or illness, it adds.
The Rt Revd Paul Butler, the Bishop of Durham and one of those who signed the letter, said: “As a society, we believe in compassion and justice. But right now, many children and families up and down our country are living in poverty.
“A combination of low pay, unstable jobs and high housing and living costs are locking families in a daily struggle to put food on the table.
“It is simply not right that some children get support and others don’t. We share a moral responsibility to make sure that everyone in our country has a decent standard of living and the same chances in life, no matter who they are or where they come from.
“The Government has an opportunity to right this wrong by removing its two-child limit policy. We urge the Prime Minister to address this burning injustice.”
The letter coincides with a new report published by the End Child Poverty Coalition, the Child Poverty Action Group and the Church of England, which warns the full impact of the policy is yet to be seen.
After the first year around 160,000 families with newborn babies are up to £2780-a-year worse off than if their youngest child had been born in the previous year, it found. From February next year, the two-child limit will also apply to families with three or more children who make a new claim for Universal Credit, irrespective of when their children were born.
By 2020-21, an estimated 640,000 families, including around two million children, will be affected by this policy, it says. The report also argues that the two-child limit and children’s benefits freeze are the most damaging pieces of welfare reform for youngsters, driving a sharp projected rise in child poverty in the next few years.
Last year the Institute for Fiscal Studies found that benefit cuts planned for the rest of this parliament will increase the rate of child poverty, reversing falls achieved since the early 2000s.
Alison Garnham, the Child Poverty Action Group’s chief executive, said the policy breaks the link between need and benefit entitlement.
She added: “We know that it is putting some mothers in the impossible position of deciding whether to continue with an unplanned pregnancy and see their family fall into poverty, or to have an abortion.
“A year in, the Government should reconsider this policy before more families are pulled below the poverty line.”
The Department for Work and Pensions say the policy will be introduced with safeguards and that those on benefits should face the same financial choices as those in work.
A DWP spokeswoman said: “We have always been clear that this policy will be delivered in the most effective, compassionate way, with the right exceptions and safeguards in place.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here