It's been three days since the royal wedding. Let's see who has moved on...and who hasn't.
The Scottish Daily Mail has decided to continue giving space to royal wedding fallout on the front page.
After dedicating the entire front page to two strangers tying the knot yesterday, they must have felt like they missed out on the chance to shout about the SNP when everyone else was.
So, today, we have the the Scottish Daily Mail covering Downing Street's continued rejection of the prospect of a second referendum.
Meanwhile, the Scottish Daily Express has found a slightly more unique take on yesterday's Union and Unionism conference.
Ruth Davidson has suggested that football can save the union. Never mind the Tories rolling over devolution, ineffective voting systems and an unequal distribution of power within the UK. A nice game of footy can resolve that.
One point awarded to Express for giving us a laugh, and ten points deducted for another royal wedding front page splash.
The i has also led with coverage of yesterday's anti-indy event.
Though rather than go after Ruth Davidson's bizarre football claims, the i has stayed with Davidson's warning that Westminster's actions will push people toward independence.
The Daily Telegraph has ran with the same line today.
It's also ran front page coverage of the royal family into day three...
As has The Herald.
They've led with a story on church abuse victims.
And finally, a classic National front cover if ever there was one.
Read more of our exclusive coverage on the BBC in Scotland:
READ: BBC is failing in its duty to Scotland, SNP tell watchdog
READ: ‘BBC has not rebuilt the trust it lost in Scotland during the indyref’
READ: BBC's flagship Reporting Scotland criticised as 'parochial’
READ: ‘The BBC doesn’t understand what’s wrong ... that’s why it cannot fix it’
READ: Scotland’s story on the BBC's UK news is too often an afterthought
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel