THE UK's trade deficit would be almost 3% greater without Scotch whisky exports, according to new analysis.
The deficit reduced from £166 billion in 2016 to £153 billion last year, research from the Scotch Whisky Association (SWA) shows.
Without Scotch whisky exports, that would have been 2.9% worse, at more than £157 billion, the analysis said.
The latest figures show that in 2017 the value of exports of Scotch whisky increased by 8.9% to a record high of £4.37bn.
Single malt exports also continued to grow, up 14% year-on-year to £1.17bn.
SWA chief executive Karen Betts said: "More Scotch whisky is enjoyed across the world than America, Canadian and Irish whiskies combined.
"Our analysis of 2017 exports shows just how well the industry is doing in our 180 markets.
"This reflects the industry's determination and hard work to take high-quality Scotch whisky to consumers all over the world.
"The UK trade deficit, currently £153bn, would have been nearly 3% greater without Scotch whisky exports.
"Likewise, Scotch plays a key role in the Scottish and UK economy, supporting thousands of jobs, including in rural parts of Scotland.
"Single malt continues to grow significantly, boosting again the value of our exports. There are signs too that the market for blended Scotch whisky is improving.
"This is a welcome indicator of future growth. Blended Scotch is the solid foundation on which our global export success has been built.
"As Brexit approaches, it's important that the government supports Scotch whisky's export success and ensures that access to EU and global markets is as good once the UK leaves the EU as it is today.
"This includes ensuring that Scotch whisky is properly protected through the geographical indication system."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here