AN invisible layer of biological compounds sitting on the sea surface slows the rate at which the world’s oceans absorb carbon dioxide, scientists have reported.
Experts from Heriot-Watt, Newcastle and Exeter universities, who published their research in the journal Nature Geoscience, say the findings have major implications for predicting our future climate.
The oceans currently absorb around one-quarter of all carbon dioxide emissions caused by human activity, making them the largest long-term sink of carbon on Earth.
Atmosphere-ocean gas exchange is controlled by turbulence at the sea surface, the main cause of which is waves generated by wind. Greater turbulence means increased gas exchange. Until now, it was difficult to calculate the effect of biological surfactants, but the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC), Leverhulme Trust and European Space Agency-funded team developed a system that directly and in real time compares “the surfactant effect” between different sea waters collected along oceanographic cruises. Using this and satellite observations, the team found surfactants can reduce carbon dioxide exchange by up to 50%.
Dr Ryan Pereira, a Lyell research fellow at Heriot-Watt University in Edinburgh, said: “As surface temperatures rise, so too do surfactants, which is why this is such a critical finding. The warmer the ocean surface gets, the more surfactants we can expect, and an even greater reduction in gas exchange.
“What we discovered at 13 sites across the Atlantic Ocean is that biological surfactants suppress the rate of gas exchange caused by the wind. These natural surfactants aren’t necessarily visible like an oil slick, or a foam, and are even difficult to identify from satellites monitoring our ocean’s surface.
“We need to be able to measure and identify the organic matter on the surface microlayer of the ocean so that we can reliably estimate rates of gas exchange of climate active gases, such as carbon dioxide and methane.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here