AN MSP who compared the Coul Links course golf bid to Donald Trump’s development says it is not game over for the US-backed resort.
Officials at Highland Council say councillors should reject the application for an 18-hole course near Embo in Sutherland. The scheme would encroach on a site of Special Scientific Interest and council officers said this would cause “significantly detrimental impact”.
This is despite arguments by the developers, including American businessmen Todd Warnock and Mike Keiser, that the facility would protect the land, boost the economy and provide jobs.
The Not Coul campaign group has backed the recommendation, as have conservation groups including RSPB Scotland and the National Trust for Scotland.
But Highlands and Islands Green MSP John Finnie says the multi-million pound development might still be approved by Highland Council’s North Planning Applications Committee on Tuesday.
Finnie, who compared the scheme to Trump’s Menie resort in Aberdeenshire in an exchange with Nicola Sturgeon in February, told The National: “The professional people have given their judgment on the worth of the case, which is based on evidence. However, it’s a decision for the elected members and they don’t always follow officers’ advice.
“I would hope that in something where so much hinges on evidence, they would follow that and reject it.”
More than 1600 objections were submitted to the local authority over the application.
Finnie said there was a risk of “history repeating itself” over the threat to protected sand dunes, as at Menie, where Scottish Natural Heritage confirmed plans to review whether special designation was still required. This follows works to the playing area and surrounding land. However, Warnock said his plan has “broad local support”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel