LAWYERS for Clara Ponsati are looking at whether to call former Spanish government ministers to court as part of her battle against extradition.
The former Catalan education minister's legal team confirmed they are considering citing ex-ministers from Mariano Rajoy's recently-ousted administration as witnesses when the full hearing gets under way in Scotland later this year.
Her solicitor said the unnamed people could be asked to comment on "controversial comments" said to have been made about St Andrews University academic Professor Ponsati's case.
Aamer Anwar spoke following a procedural hearing at Edinburgh Sheriff Court, during which it emerged that the Crown and the academic's legal team are drawing up a list of experts to give evidence during the four-week hearing scheduled to take place in the summer.
Speaking outside court, Mr Anwar said: "We're instructed to consider citing to our court ex-ministers from Rajoy's regime to expand on their controversial comments that fall within the ambit of victimisation and political persecution."
Socialist leader Pedro Sanchez was recently sworn in as Spain's prime minister, after he successfully ousted predecessor Mr Rajoy in a no-confidence vote.
Prof Ponsati is being sought by the authorities in Madrid on charges of violent rebellion and misappropriation of public funds over her role in Catalonia's controversial independence referendum last year.
Her legal team, who describe the prosecution as "politically motivated" by Spain, say she could face a total sentence of up to 33 years if she is sent there and convicted of the charges, raising fears the 61-year-old could spend the rest of her life in jail.
Mr Anwar said of Tuesday's hearing: "The Crown has confirmed that it accepts rebellion is not covered by the box-ticking exercise of corruption in the framework of the extradition treaty...
"Her Majesty's Advocate, acting on behalf of the Kingdom of Spain, has had since March to confirm what crime would have been committed in the law of Scotland and this has yet to be clarified.
"Our position remains that we cannot see what crime known to the law of Scotland has allegedly been committed by Professor Clara Ponsati."
John Scott QC, for the Crown, earlier told the court a little more time was needed to consider the issue of what crime or crimes would be covered in Scotland.
He added that witnesses were still being identified "on both sides of the table".
Prof Ponsati was excused from attending Tuesday's hearing before Sheriff Nigel Ross QC.
Gordon Jackson QC, representing the academic, said the team had consulted with various experts in England and had been visited by a Spanish solicitor.
He said: "We have now identified approximately 14 experts from academia, to practitioners, political commentators, constitutional law experts and non-governmental organisations."
They are being asked about their availability and their willingness to give evidence, with a list expected to be drawn up before the next hearing, the court was told.
He added that the team may also seek to bring ministers from Spain to court "to deal with certain issues".
A further procedural hearing will take place on July 5.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel