A HOLYROOD committee has heard that there is no evidence that communities are effected long-term by bank branch closures.
Professor Russel Griggs told MSPs on the Holyrood Economy Committee that his research suggests that once local branches close their doors, communities in the affected areas find a way to “move on” .
Consumer organisation Which? has countered the claims saying there is a need for more robust research to be carried out.
The committee was taking evidence on the impact of closures on local businesses, consumers and the Scottish economy in the wake of the RBS decision to shut at least 52 branches across the country, with a further 10 under review.
Griggs, chairman of the new South of Scotland Economic Partnership, carried out a recent review of the 2015 access to banking protocol put in place to manage the way bank branch closures are handled.
He said: “When I did my work, which is now two years ago, and went back and spoke to the communities that had lost their banks ... there’s no long-term empirical evidence just now to show that there is any effect.
“If you go back and speak to a lot of the communities, most communities have moved on, so they found other ways to do things, etc.
“So while there was a heavy impact at the time, the communities, the businesses, etc, have found other ways of doing what they were going to do and in fact one of them, when I went to see them, said it’s pointless having the discussion because we’ve all moved on now and we don’t want to go back to where we were.
“So I think it probably has a short-term effect but the evidence that I saw as I went around and visited probably 20 or 30 places across the whole of the UK looking at this, is that it settles down again and people go back to doing what they used to do but just in a different way and it’s interesting they don’t tend to move banks.”
He said that during recent consultations held with hundreds of people across the south of Scotland in connection with the new economic partnership, bank branch closures had been raised just once.
But Thomas Docherty, public affairs manager for consumer organisation Which?, said there was a need for more robust evidence on the long-term effects.
He said: “There hasn’t been a proper study done by anybody of what those longer-term impacts would be on the rate of closures. By the end of this year in Scotland more than 250 branches will have closed in the last four years.
“I think when you start to get that scale of closures somebody should be stepping up and carrying out that proper investigation. The people who are most likely of course to be affected are older customers and customers who are more vulnerable.
“Yes online banking is growing but only 56% of customers, according to UK Finance, currently use online banking, so what is happening to the other 44% – how are their needs being serviced?”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here