THERE is “no way” that energy firms will be able to extract 20 billion barrels of oil from the North Sea while exploration rates remain at a record low, MPs have been told.
Oil tycoon Sir Ian Wood said there needed to be “some serious exploration done” to extract the maximum 20 billion barrels that could remain underground.
He spoke out after Deirdre Michie, chief executive of industry body Oil and Gas UK, told the Scottish Affairs Committee that drilling in the North Sea had hit an all-time low.
The Oil and Gas Authority (OGA) estimated there are the equivalent of between 10 and 20 billion barrels of oil remaining off the shore of the UK. With some 44 billion barrels already removed, she said that meant “you could say there is another third of activity still to go after”.
But Wood, who previously carried out a review for the UK Government into how to maximise recovery, said: “There’s no way we’re going to get close to 20 billion barrels unless there is some serious exploration done.”
He told the committee, which is carrying out an inquiry into the future of the oil and gas sector: “Disappointingly we’re still looking at 11.7 billion barrels, that’s the latest figure.
“That’s way short of the 20 billion barrels we hoped might come.”
Michie said the key challenge facing the industry was “that our drilling activity continues to be at an all-time low”.
In the past four years improved efficiency in the North Sea has led to an “extraordinary” 16% increase in production, she said.
Michie added: “The concern is with the low levels of exploration as we look past 2020 we will start to see production falling away.”
She insisted there was a “long-term and sustainable future” for the sector.
Michie told the committee: “The OGA estimates there is between 10 to 20 billion barrels of oil equivalent still out there, and when you compare that with where we have come from, we have taken out 44 billion barrels to date, so you could say there is another third of activity still to go after.”
Consequently Oil and Gas UK is “looking to extend the productive life of the basin well into the 2030s and beyond,” she said.
“We consider there is a long-term and sustainable future for this industry if all things come together and we continue to work in the way we have been working.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel