FOR many asylum seekers, the home they receive on arrival in Scotland is the first safe place they have known in years.
This accommodation plays a vital part in giving stability to those who are in a new country and may be recovering from trauma or human rights abuses.
As such, the announcement from Serco that it will start evicting 300 individuals and families who have been told they cannot stay in the UK from next Monday, potentially giving them seven days’ notice to leave their home, is a disgrace and this course of action should be stopped immediately.
READ MORE: Outrage over 'brutal' plan to evict 300 asylum seekers in Glasgow
This act is compounded by the fact that Glasgow City Council is legally prevented from providing accommodation for people with no leave to remain and no recourse to public funds. This act will literally put hundreds of people on the street.
Yes, the policy relates to people whose asylum claims have been refused, however we know from past experience that many are likely to appeal which often leads to decisions being reversed, and they may well be entitled to accommodation while they undertake this process.
Furthermore, there is a legitimate question about the legality of such a measure and whether Serco is allowed to change locks unilaterally or whether a court summons is required.
Notwithstanding, we should also be asking whether as a civilised society we have the complete lack of humanity to throw into the streets displaced vulnerable persons and families, stranded thousands of miles from their dangerous homelands, with little more than the clothes on their backs and their dignity in tatters.
READ MORE: Study finds Syrian refugees are much happier in Scotland than in England
By threatening to evict so many people at the same time, Serco is creating a situation where Glasgow’s voluntary sector is completely unprepared for a sudden surge in people needing accommodation and support. It is vital that Serco and the Home Office work with local organisations to ensure that large numbers of people do not end up homeless on the streets of Glasgow.
Jim Strang is the Vice President of the Chartered Institute of Housing and Chief Executive of Parkhead Housing Association.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel