SNP councillor Chris McEleny has revealed that the Ministry of Defence is challenging his discrimination case victory.
A judge ruled at a preliminary hearing last week that McEleny had sufficient grounds to take his former employer to a tribunal.
The judge backed McEleny’s argument that support for Scottish independence is a “philosophical belief” and not just a political opinion, which means it is protected by equality law.
READ MORE: The philosophy of politics highlights the dilemmas of nationalist identity
However, McEleny, the SNP group leader on Inverclyde Council, tweeted yesterday: “Have been informed today that @DefenceHQ MOD have appealed to have the decision in the discrimination case regarding belief in Scottish independence reconsidered and revoked.”
McEleny claimed he was unfairly targeted over his support for independence while working as an electrician at a munitions depot in Bishopton, Renfrewshire, in 2016.
His security clearance was withdrawn after he announced he was standing in the SNP’s depute leadership contest. McEleny quit his job and said he would take the MoD to a tribunal.
He said he was questioned by officials from National Security Vetting – part of the MoD – on issues that included his views on Trident, his mental health, Irish politics, independence and Rangers FC.
Judge France Eccles ruled that sovereignty and self-determination were “weighty and substantial aspects of human life” and the case could go ahead.
READ MORE: Lord Advocate: UK Government lawyers ‘wrong’ on devolved powers
McEleny, who was backed by written representations from former First Minister Alex Salmond, argued that his belief in independence was “serious, cohesive and important”.
The MoD claimed independence and the values of the SNP are not political opinions worthy of respect in any democratic country outside the UK and that support for independence was not on a par with other beliefs.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel