A NUMBER of high-profile cancellations turned Israel’s Meteor music festival into the latest battleground involving the boycott movement seeking to end Israeli rule over Palestinians.
The festival aimed to bring together indie groups from around the world in what organisers billed as a Woodstock-like “cutting edge musical journey that surpasses borders and distorts time and space”.
Instead, some 20 acts, including headliner Lana Del Rey, withdrew at the last minute amid apparent pressure from the BDS campaign.
Campaign organisers have now claimed success, saying it reflects growing opposition to Israeli government policies among international millennials.
“The fact that these artists are cancelling is showing just how different the younger generation is viewing Israel,” said Diana Buttu, a Palestinian analyst who supports BDS – which stands for boycott, divestment and sanctions.
The campaign, founded in 2005, calls for such actions against Israeli businesses, cultural institutions and universities, with its message resonating around the world.
BDS said it seeks to end Israel’s occupation of lands captured in the 1967 Middle East war and what it describes as discrimination against Israel’s Arab minority.
It calls for the “right of return” for millions of Palestinian refugees and their descendants to homes their ancestors fled or were expelled from in the 1948 war over Israel’s creation.
Israel claims the campaign masks a deeper aim of delegitimising or even destroying the country.
A growing list of performers, including Israeli-American actress Natalie Portman and singer Lorde, have cancelled appearances in Israel in recent months out of concern over Israeli policies.
Del Rey joined that list on August 31 when she announced that she was withdrawing from the Meteor Festival after an intense BDS lobbying campaign. In a statement on Twitter, the Grammy-nominated singer said she was “postponing” until she could perform for both Israeli and Palestinian audiences.
Other no-shows included Of Montreal, a popular indie band that previously performed in Israel.
“Now is not the time for escapism and celebrations,” the group said on Facebook.
“Now is the time for activism and protests against Israeli apartheid, Israeli occupation of the West Bank and the human rights atrocities being carried out every day in Gaza by Israeli forces.”
Del Rey did not explicitly endorse the boycott message, and Portman said outright that she does not support BDS.
Numerous A-listers, including Aerosmith, the Rolling Stones, Madonna, Justin Timberlake and Justin Bieber have performed in Israel in recent years.
Last year, the Australian musician Nick Cave accused the boycott movement of trying to “bully” artists who played in Israel.
Israel’s ministry of strategic affairs spends millions of dollars fighting BDS and has banned some activists from entering the country. Israel and its supporters also run outreach programmes on US college campuses, but opinion polls indicate waning support for Israel among American millennials.
In the case of the Meteor Festival, Israel’s strategic affairs ministry said a “small minority” of musicians backed out, arguing that they had fallen prey “to the incitement and hate-filled agenda of the Israel boycott movement”, with thousands of people still attending.
Festival organisers argued that music should unite people and that BDS “insanely politicised our event”.
BDS now has its sights on the Eurovision Song Contest.
Israel is expected to host the event next year, and last week dozens of European artists, led by former Pink Floyd frontman Roger Waters, signed a letter calling for the contest to be moved to another country.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here