IT was pleasing to see the Jacobite swords in yesterday’s guest article by Stuart McHardy on the forgotten Anti Union Rebellion of 1708 (Opposition to the Union has been erased from our history, September 11). He mentions the Jacobite broadswords bearing the inscription, “Prosperity to Scotland and No Union”.
The Earl of Mar, “Bobbing John”, who led the 1715 and Anti Union Rebellion, was a signatory to the Union who rebelled, complaining that his family did not get a big enough share of the bribes. It could be argued that he actually won the Battle of Sherramuir. But he dispersed his Highland troops after the battle, leaving Red John of the Battles to retreat in good order to Dunblane and then hold Stirling, the gateway to the Highlands. Red John Glas, or Campbell, led the Scottish MPs against the Union Treaty four years later and was told that they were bought and sold to be laughed at, “to their Scotch faces”.
Mar Castle still has a display of the banner, “Prosperity to Scotland and No Union”. The current Earl is LibDem “Inbetweener” and latter-day “lang-faced” Unionist Whigamore. The Revolutionary Earl of Mar supported John MacLean, Scottish republican socialist, who advocated Scottish independence some 20-odd years afore the modern SNP was formed. Both were members of the “Declaration of Arbroath 1320” Committee and spoke there with other radical republicans such as James Maxton.
READ MORE: The map which proves opposition to Union was erased from Scotland's history
It is now well known that copies of the Treaty were burnt at every Mercat Cross in Scotland and the Treaty itself was signed in a cellar in the Scots Parliament whilst the coach had to be escorted by dragoons across the Boarder. A local meenister beseeched the rioting Weegie locals to be “up and anent for the city of God” and a young General Wade brought his redcoats from Eglinton Barracks to restore order. Wade, an Irish Protestant, built more roads and bridges in the Highlands after the ‘15 Rebellion than Ernest Marples and MacAlpine’s Fusiliers did in the 1960s.
What is not so well known is that Duke of Hamilton led an Anti Union Rebellion in 1708 and failed to turn up due to a toothache. The Jacobites came from the north and easily took Edinburgh, where the toon’s Hielan’ Guards let them in.
The Cameronians marched from the south west in support and were grassed up at Dumfries, where the local wimmen fought the British troops on the streets. It is now believed that the Duke of Hamilton was a double agent, due to his lacklustre performance in Parliament, kinda like “Corb the Abstainer” today on Brexit etc.
Again, what else is ignored by modern historians is the fact that the Jacobites were opposed to the so called “Union“, where only 1% of Scots had the vote. King James declared the annulment of the Parliamentary Union of 1707, but not the regal Union of 1603, when he landed, too late at Peterhead after the ‘15 was over. Cherlie also did the same in his Manifesto of 1745 when he landed at Glenfinnon. His troops were happy to declare him at Edinburgh, but not so happy to have him as a Brit King in London.
Cherlie adapted tartan as his party colours, explaining the hatred today emanating from the Proscription Act of 1746. English Jacobite MPs wore tartan waistcoats as a political statement. The Manchester Jacobite Regiment left in Carlisle Castle was tortured to death. Jacobite wounded prisoners were murdered and tortured too, by redcoat officers who were paroled after Prestonpans and others battles.
One hopes oor “English For Yes” will join us in a happier fate.
Donald Anderson
Glasgow
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel