This article was brought to you by The Ferret
OPPONENTS of fracking in Scotland are considered “domestic extremists” by Police Scotland despite Home Office advice that campaigners should not be bracketed alongside the likes of Islamic State and neo-Nazis under counter terrorism strategy.
Official documents also reveal that Police Scotland has been trying to infiltrate communities near Ineos’s Grangemouth chemicals plant in order to glean information on people involved with peaceful anti-fracking groups.
READ MORE: Ineos loses legal challenge against Scottish Government's fracking ban
The revelations by research group Spinwatch have prompted a furious response from anti-fracking groups who are calling on the Justice Committee at the Scottish Parliament to ask that Police Scotland urgently changes its approach.
READ MORE: Westminster urged to follow Scotland's lead with fracking inquiry
Police Scotland said in response that it “supports the public’s right to protest”.
Over the past five years, at least seven of the 11 regional units that form the UK’s National Counter Terrorism Policing Network (UNCPTN) have either carried out surveillance and/or “unjustifiably smeared” anti-fracking campaigners, says Spinwatch.
READ MORE: Scotland a 'world leader' in assessing dangers of fracking
This controversial approach ignores advice from the Home Office in 2016 which said that “support for anti-fracking is not an indicator of vulnerability” under the UK Government’s Prevent strategy, a policy introduced to combat terrorism.
The UNCTPN involves specialist officers working with MI5 and “other partners” to find information to “thwart terrorist planning and help bring perpetrators to justice”.
There are 11 regional counter terrorism units (CTU) and intelligence units (CTIU), who work with a range of partners to prevent terrorist activity, according to the National Police Chiefs’ Council. These regional CTUs seek intelligence in their areas, with the Scotland Counter Terrorism Intelligence Unit (SCTIU) gathering information north of the Border .
Until early 2018, Police Scotland was headed by Chief Constable Phil Gormley, a former Met Special Branch chief of two undercover policing units, including the notorious Special Demonstration Squad that infiltrated and spied on activist and environmental protest groups.
In his foreword for Police Scotland’s Annual Police Plan for 2017-18, Gormley outlined how Scottish policing would be delivered over the coming year in alignment with a long-term strategic vision.
On tackling counter terrorism and domestic extremism, the plan says: “In 2017-18 we will continue to pursue terrorists and those who sponsor them and explore all opportunities to disrupt and detect such activities.”
While referring to the “so-called Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS)” and “Northern Ireland Related Terrorism (NIRT)”, the document also labels anti-fracking groups and hunt saboteurs as a “Domestic Extremism” (DE) threat, placing them alongside banned neo-Nazi terrorist groups, Scottish Dawn and National Action.
Police Scotland’s report says: “The DE threat within the UK remains dominated by Extreme Right Wing (XRW) activity and the impact on public order.
‘‘This has the potential to increase significantly based upon the emotiveness of current affairs, particularly in relation to anti-Muslim sentiment amongst XRW individuals as a result of recent terrorist events and the large number of migrants displaced from Syria, North Africa and the Middle East regions as a result of ongoing conflicts.
“XRW activity in Scotland has been observed over animal rights, particularly in relation to hunt saboteurs. There continue to be protests around shale oil and gas extraction and unconventional oil and gas extraction, both commonly referred to as ‘fracking’.
‘‘In 2017-18, we will continue to closely monitor individuals and groups that are involved/suspected to be involved in the DE arena and explore all opportunities to disrupt and detect their activities.”
Police Scotland’s Local Police Plan 2017-20 for the Falkirk region similarly brands anti-fracking protests as a potential threat, in its discussion of counter terrorism risks in towns close to Ineos’s chemicals plant, which is classified as critical national infrastructure.
The plan says that one strategy is to gather intelligence from local communities. Under the heading “Counter Terrorism”, Police Scotland says: “Seeking the support of communities to develop the national intelligence picture around terrorism, domestic extremism and potential protests around fracking, shale oil and gas extraction given the nature of our commercial business infrastructure located in the Grangemouth area.”
Official documents reveal similar approaches by other UK police forces. In the Midlands, a key fracking battleground, Special Branch officers have provided significant intelligence support for the policing of anti-fracking demonstrations. There are two regional counter terrorism units covering the East and West Midlands who spy on the anti-fracking movement. The West Midlands Counter Terrorism Unit (WMCTU) labels environmental groups taking part in “anti-fracking protest camps and coordinated direct action” as potential domestic extremists alongside lone wolf and far-right actors.
Anti-fracking campaigners based in Scotland said in response that Police Scotland must change its strategy.
Penny Cole, of Frackwatch Glasgow, said her group’s main activity in the past two years has been to inform people in Glasgow of the “negative aspects of fracking and encourage them to respond to a Scottish Government consultation”.
She added: “We did it through flyers, postcards, badges, public meetings, street stalls, film shows, social media and fun events.
‘‘Now it seems the members of Frackwatch might be under surveillance – what might that be? Being followed, our phones tapped, our activities filmed? What possible justification is there? It is totally undemocratic and the Scottish Parliament Justice Committee should tell Police Scotland to stop it at once.”
Donald Campbell, chair of the Broad Alliance, a coalition of Scottish communities opposed to unconventional oil and gas development, also said the Justice Committee should urge Police Scotland to change policy.
He added: “Can Police Scotland point to one example of illegal activities by any individual in the Scottish anti-fracking movement, or any of the groups that make up the Broad Alliance? In the recent consultation, 60,000 people told the Scottish Government to ban fracking – are they all ‘domestic extremists’?
‘‘The Broad Alliance are stakeholders in the decision-making process over fracking, at the request of the Scottish Government. What does it say about our consultation system if the very people asked to contribute, on behalf of communities, are then characterised as extremists?”
Police Scotland said in response: “Police Scotland supports the public’s right to protest against anything that concerns them, and will facilitate peaceful protests as long as these are conducted within the law.”
Iain Livingstone replaced Phil Gormley as Scotland’s chief constable in August. Chief Constable Livingstone also has links to counter terrorism units, as reported by The Ferret in 2016, when a freedom of information request revealed he had attended meetings of the Association of Chief Police Officers’ Terrorism and Allied Matters Committee, aka ACPO TAM. ACPO TAM was responsible for counter terrorism and oversaw the UK’s national domestic extremism units whose activities are being investigated by Lord Justice Pitchford.
The committee’s remit covered undercover officers with the Metropolitan Police who infiltrated campaigning groups and spied on animal rights activists and environmentalists, among others deemed domestic extremists.
The Ferret revealed in 2015 that animal rights activists and both environment and anti-nuclear campaigners were all deemed potential terrorist threats by Glasgow City Council. Using freedom of information legislation, details were obtained of an internal GCC course entitled Protect Against Terrorism, which was produced to advise the council’s 20,000 employees on potential terrorist threats. In a section entitled, What is Terrorism? GCC cited “animal rights”, “environmental” and “anti-nuclear” under a sub-heading, “Who Are Our Current Threats?”.
This was alongside a mention of neo-Nazi David Copeland, who murdered three people and injured more than 100 others when he detonated a nail bomb in Soho, London, in 1999.
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: “Operational policing is a matter for Police Scotland. Both the Scottish Government and Police Scotland support the public’s right to peaceful protests that are conducted within the law.”
John Finnie MSP, the Scottish Greens’ Justice spokesperson who sits on the Justice Committee at Holyrood, said that citing anti-fracking protests as examples of domestic extremism is “frankly absurd” and means that “Greens, other political parties and even government ministers, must all have been monitored for campaigning against fracking”.
“Of course, to the delight of communities throughout Scotland, fracking is banned, in spite of Police Scotland’s best efforts to ‘disrupt’ the activities of environmental campaigners,” he added.
Finnie said he intends to raise the issue with Police Scotland
Mary Church, of Earth Scotland, said: “The vilification of frontline anti-fracking activists could have a serious chilling effect on people who see injustice and environmental damage and want to speak up. At this critical stage in the fight to stop climate
catastrophe, we need to be encouraging more people to step up to take action, not labelling them as a danger to society.”
The Ferret is an editorially independent, not-for-profit co-operative run by its journalists and subscribers. You can find it at https://theferret.scot/ and can subscribe for £3 a month here: https://theferret.scot/subscribe/
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel