MSP Joan McAlpine has urged a major landowner not to clear a couple off the land in a modern “lowland clearances”.
The South Scotland MSP compared the actions of Buccleuch Estate to those of the Highland landowners in the 18th and 19th centuries.
McAlpine made the comment as she hit out at plans to sell land used by tenant farmers Alison and David Telfer.
The couple aim to stay at the farm near Langholm until they retire in five years’ time. However, their five-year fixed lease ends in November 2019 and the property is part of almost 9000 acres that Buccleuch announced for sale late last week.
The top part of their land, currently used for sheep, will be offered for tree planting.
The landowner has promised that “any sale of land encompassing tenanted farms would see current leasing agreements honoured” and says the Telfers’ lease has already been extended by 19 months, with the couple turning down the chance to buy the lower section where the farmhouse is located.
McAlpine said: “The sale came as a complete surprise to Alison and David and just demonstrates how little power tenants like them have.
“Scottish history is stained by the legacy of the clearances.
“The treatment of the Telfers is akin to the lowland clearances for the modern age and it cannot be allowed to stand.”
However, rejecting what it called a “complete distortion of the facts”, a Buccleuch spokesperson said: “If these extensions are unsuitable, Mr and Mrs Telfer should have let us know and they have been aware of our intention to sell the for over a year.”
He added: “We have also written to Ms McAlpine to spell out the facts of this case and it is regrettable that she has chosen to ignore the legal framework of short-term tenancies and resorts to inaccurate and inflammatory statements.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel