ITV’s flagship breakfast news show broke strict broadcasting rules on accuracy and impartiality during an interview with Nicola Sturgeon, according to regulator Ofcom.
During an interview with the First Minister on Good Morning Britain in June, host Ben Shephard read out a quote which he said was from the party’s Sustainable Growth Commission report, claiming the SNP would have to impose “austerity policies” and “years of tight public spending” on Scotland if voters backed Yes at the next referendum.
That quote, however, came from an analysis of the Growth Commission’s report by the Institute of Fiscal Studies.
READ MORE: Twitter reacts to First Minister's refusal to appear with Steve Bannon
When Sturgeon attempted to correct Shephard, his co-host Kate Garraway ignored her and told her to "answer the question".
Ofcom launched an investigation after a viewer complained. In their findings, published today, the regulator said it breached broadcasting guidelines on accuracy and impartiality.
During the interview, Shephard said: “This report actually says that the loss of money from Westminster, were you to get independence, that is created by the Barnett Formula would mean that the SNP would have to impose austerity policies and recommends years of tight public spending to halve Scotland’s deficit and in order to keep the pound.”
Sturgeon replied: “The report doesn’t say what you’ve just said. The report explicitly rejects austerity, the report recommends that an independent Scotland should have real terms growth in spending rather than the cuts we’ve seen.”
Shephard waved a piece of paper at Sturgeon and claimed he was reading directly from the report.
In their written ruling, Ofcom said: “Mr Shephard was referring to a summary, written by the GMB production team, of a critique of the Commission Report produced by the Institute of Financial Studies.
READ MORE: Key points from the Sustainable Growth Commission report
“We therefore considered the statement was clearly inaccurate. David and Victoria “We recognised that Ms Sturgeon sought to correct the inaccuracy on a number of occasions during the interview. However, in each case, her correction was either dismissed or ignored by the presenters.
"For example, as described above, Mr Shephard responded to Ms Sturgeon’s initial correction by reiterating the original inaccuracy.
“Later, when Ms Sturgeon said ‘the report does not say what you said’, Ms Garraway interrupted and told her to ‘answer my question’.
“We considered that the inaccuracy in this case had a significant impact on the remainder of the interview. This was because viewers would have not known whether Mr Shephard or Ms Sturgeon was accurately reflecting the findings of Commission Report.
“This potentially left viewers with an erroneous impression that Ms Sturgeon was either unclear about the contents of the report or deliberately misrepresenting its findings.”
ITV said the error “was entirely unintentional and made in the heat of a live broadcast interview”.
They added Shephard was reading from briefing notes which had been prepared by the programme’s editorial team which were “insufficiently clearly written”.
The broadcaster was also found in breach of guidelines by Ofcom for failing to make an on air apology until four weeks after the interview was broadcast.
Their apology read: “On June 8 we interviewed Scotland’s First Minister Nicola Sturgeon, during which we suggested to her that the SNP’s Sustainable Growth Commission Report had said austerity measures would be required in the event of Scottish independence.
“In fact, the quote that we put to the First Minister was a summary of a critique of the Commission Report made by the Institute of Fiscal Studies, and not a quote from the Commission Report itself. We apologise for this error and for any confusion caused.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel