CHANNEL 4 has come under fire for leaving the SNP out of a Brexit debate due to be screened live tonight – while giving a prime spot to Nigel Farage.
An inside source claims the broadcaster had pursued Nicola Sturgeon, but editors cut off contact after party bosses questioned who else was to appear on the panel.
The snub means that Brexit: What the Nation Really Thinks will lack representation from the UK’s second-largest political party.
READ MORE: Twitter users react furiously as Channel 4 shuts SNP out of Brexit debate
One in every 30 adults in Scotland is a member of the SNP and, with 125,500 people signed up, the total outnumbers that of the Tories.
Tonight’s show, to be made in Birmingham and hosted by Krishnan Guru-Murthy, centres around an exclusive poll for Channel 4 that promises to “reveal where the British public now stand on all key aspects of Brexit”. This includes immigration, the economy and Northern Ireland.
Taking part are Justice Secretary David Gauke; shadow trade secretary Barry Gardiner; Green MP Caroline Lucas, representing The People’s Vote; and former Ukip leader Nigel Farage, representing Leave Means Leave. The panelists will be asked the question: “With the nation divided over Brexit, would a referendum on the terms of the UK’s deal provide unity?”
It is understood that Channel 4 – which promised more representative content when launching its 4 All The UK strategy earlier this year – “went silent” after the SNP said Sturgeon would only appear alongside a “like-for-like” politician, and that another representative could be put forward if less senior figures from other parties were involved.
A spokesperson for Channel 4 told The National: “We did not disinvite the SNP. We were not inviting participants to represent specific political parties, but to reflect specific viewpoints on the Brexit debate.
“It was on that basis that we approached Nicola Sturgeon – as a senior politician calling for a new referendum, rather than to represent the SNP specifically.
“As this invitation was turned down, the production team approached alternatives to offer that perspective. An appropriately wide range of significant views will be included within the programme and given due weight.”
Stephen Gethins, the SNP’s Europe spokesperson, said: “The SNP have been leading in trying to find a cross-party consensus and a way through the chaos created by Brexit.
“The SNP has been at the heart of efforts by parties at Westminster to find compromises, most recently taking a cross-party delegation to meet Michel Barnier.
“In a parliament of minorities, reaching out across party divides is vital and a key part of finding a solution.
Gethins added: “The UK is not the two-party state many presume it to be, but a plural democracy with different parties leading in each of its constituent nations. Channel 4 needs to catch up with that.”
READ MORE: Twitter users react furiously as Channel 4 shuts SNP out of Brexit debate
SNP Students have turned down an invitation to appear in the audience of the show in protest at the channel’s “deeply disappointing” decision not to include a representative of the party.
Citing Scotland’s 62% Remain vote, Michael Gibbons, the group’s national convener, branded the organisation’s invite a “box-ticking exercise”, stating: “The editorial decision to exclude Scotland’s voice from this debate makes a mockery of the programme’s title, in which ‘nation’ I presume means UK – ie, England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland.
“More significantly it seriously undermines your credentials as a broadcaster in Scotland that is meant to be ‘best suited to serve all of the UK’.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel