JEREMY Hunt has insisted that the Iran nuclear deal is not yet dead.
The Foreign Secretary said there was a “small window” of hope for preventing the international agreement aimed at stopping Tehran gaining nuclear weapons from unravelling.
Speaking on his way into a Brussels meeting of EU foreign ministers on the issue, Hunt said of the agreement: “Well, it isn’t dead yet.
Heading to Brussels for urgent talks on how to reduce tensions with Iran. Their approach to Mid East has been profoundly destabilising but we want to reduce not raise tensions over Grace 1 and avoid a nuclearised region. But a deal is a deal and if one side breaches it... pic.twitter.com/n9MngbpZuX
— Jeremy Hunt (@Jeremy_Hunt) July 15, 2019
“And we are totally committed to keeping the Middle East denuclearised.
“If Iran acquires nuclear weapons then other countries in the region will acquire nuclear weapons.
“It becomes a very, very toxic and dangerous situation.
“We are looking to find a way to preserve the nuclear deal.
“Iran is still a good year away from developing a nuclear weapon.
“We think there is still some closing but small window to keep the deal alive, and that’s what I’m here to talk about.
“What we are looking for is to give Iran a way out of this so that they can get back into compliance with that nuclear deal.”
The comments came as the US urged European allies to take a tougher stance on Iran after US president Donald Trump pulled America out of the nuclear deal with Tehran.
READ MORE: President Trump withdrew from Iran nuclear deal to spite Obama, leaks reveal
Gordon Sondland, the US ambassador to the EU, said: “I think that the time for reflection is over.
“I think it’s time to act, and by acting, I mean that our European friends should join the US in unequivocally condemning Iran’s actions with respect to their malign activities, not just in the Strait of Hormuz but throughout the world, and bring them back to the table to discuss a comprehensive negotiation over all of their activities, including currently being the world’s lead state sponsor of terror, plotting attacks in Europe, their missile development programme and their general Middle East aggression.”
On BBC Radio 4’s Today programme he dismissed as “complete nonsense” an assessment by Sir Kim Darroch that Mr Trump decided to pull out of the Iran nuclear deal in an act of spite because it was agreed by his predecessor Barack Obama.
Sir Kim resigned as UK ambassador to Washington after his sensitive diplomatic dispatches were leaked, and Mr Sondland said Mr Trump’s approach to the Iran deal had been “very, very thoughtful”.
Hunt’s attendance at the EU summit comes after he offered to help secure the release of the Iranian supertanker Grace 1, held in Gibraltar after being detained in an operation involving British Royal Marines.
In a telephone call with Iranian foreign minister Mohammad Javad Zarif on Saturday, Hunt sought to reassure him the vessel was intercepted over suspicions it was carrying oil to Syria – and not because it was Iranian.
He said he had offered to facilitate the tanker’s release in return for guarantees from Tehran that it would not breach EU sanctions on the Assad regime.
The move comes amid heightened tensions in the Gulf.
Last week, a Royal Navy warship intervened to drive off Iranian patrol boats after they approached a British tanker as it sailed through the Strait of Hormuz.
It prompted fears the Iranians were trying to seize a UK ship in retaliation for the detention of the Grace 1.
It was the latest in a series of incidents in the region, prompting fears of a slide into all-out conflict.
In recent weeks, the US has sent thousands of troops, an aircraft carrier, nuclear-capable B-52 bombers and advanced fighter jets to the Middle East.
Iran, meanwhile, has begun exceeding limits on uranium enrichment agreed in the 2015 deal amid frustration in Tehran at the return of crippling US economic sanctions.
While the Europeans say they still support the agreement – which lifted sanctions in return for Iran curbing its nuclear programme – in practice they have found it difficult to get round the US measures.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here