BORIS Johnson is to hold talks with European Commission president Jean-Claude Juncker as he continues his efforts to find a new Brexit deal.
The Prime Minister will travel to Luxembourg on Monday for his first meeting with Juncker since entering Number 10 in July, Downing Street said.
Number 10 sources played down the prospect of an imminent breakthrough however, insisting there was still “a long way to go”.
Earlier, Irish premier Leo Varadkar warned that the gap between the two sides on the crucial issue of the Northern Ireland backstop was still “very wide”.
“We have always said we would be willing to look at alternative arrangements, but what we’re seeing falls far short,” Varadkar said.
“We are exploring what is possible. The gap is very wide but we will fight for and work for a deal until the last moment, but not at any cost.”
Johnson’s meeting with Juncker follows talks with other key EU players including Varadkar, German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Emmanuel Macron.
A European Commission spokeswoman said Mr Juncker was “looking forward to working constructively” with the Prime Minister.
She said the talks, over a working lunch, would be held at a “neutral location” rather than the British Embassy or a commission venue.
Juncker will then address the European Parliament in Strasbourg on Wednesday on the progress in the negotiations.
“By common accord they agreed to meet in Luxembourg on Monday,” the spokeswoman told a briefing in Brussels.
“They have been trying to arrange a meeting for a while now. They’ve already spoken on the phone, so I think it’s the willingness that comes from both sides.”
Earlier, DUP leader Arlene Foster dismissed reports that her party was ready to help Mr Johnson get a deal by softening its Brexit “red lines”.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">UK must leave as one nation. We are keen to see a sensible deal but not one that divides the internal market of the UK. We will not support any arrangements that create a barrier to East West trade. Anonymous sources lead to nonsense stories. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/frontpages?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#frontpages</a></p>— Arlene Foster (@DUPleader) <a href="https://twitter.com/DUPleader/status/1172279119968657413?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 12, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
The Times reported the DUP was prepared to accept some EU rules after Brexit as part of a new agreement to replace the backstop – intended to ensure there is no return of a hard border with the Republic.
It said the party was ready to drop its objections to regulatory checks between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK – something it has vehemently resisted.
However, Foster said they remained opposed to what would amount to a Northern Ireland-only backstop with a border in the Irish Sea.
“UK must leave as one nation. We are keen to see a sensible deal but not one that divides the internal market of the UK,” she tweeted.
“We will not support any arrangements that create a barrier to East West trade. Anonymous sources lead to nonsense stories.”
The support of the DUP’s 10 MPs – who helped prop up Theresa May’s Government – is likely to be crucial if Johnson is to get a new deal through the Commons.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel