THE candidates vying to become the SNP ’s Women’s Convener have been offered advice on “how to protect themselves” amid tensions over the gender recognition act.
In a startling statement in the party’s conference handbook, the outgoing convener Fiona Robertson says a significant portion of her time in the post has been spent dealing with the “abusive behaviour” towards members who express “support for equalities”.
She adds: “I have offered advice to people running for the new convener positions regarding what the personal cost is likely to be and how to protect themselves.”
Earlier this year, the government delayed plans to bring in legislation to make it easier for trans people to self-identify, saying there needed to be further consultation.
There have been high profile splits in the party over the issue.
Scottish ministers Kate Forbes, Ash Denham and Ivan McKee, and MP Joanna Cherry were among 15 parliamentarians who signed an open letter warning Nicola Sturgeon not to “rush” ahead with plans.
The 15 said that “conflating sex with gender identification affects a wide range of policy and service delivery, including data collection, education, health and social care, justice and sport.”
The letter adds: “Changing the definition of male and female is a matter of profound significance.”
A number of high profile politicians, including MPs Mhairi Black and Hannah Bardell, have publicly disagreed with their colleagues.
Black described the arguments against self-id as “tired, homophobic guff”.
Currently, trans people who wish to change their legally-recognised gender must “prove” they are trans, often through psychiatric and medical diagnoses and by living in the gender they wish to be recognised as for at least two years.
The government is to publish a draft Gender Recognition (Scotland) Bill before the end of the year for consultation which will ask for opinions on removing requirements to provide medical evidence and the time required to have been living in their acquired gender down to six months.
Speaking to The National, Robertson warned of “an anti-trans lobby” working “with the homophobic right in the USA”.
“A lot of people in Scotland are being radicalised against trans people; they call it peak trans-ing,” she said.
“These groups are well-organised and effective online, so the abuse they target at anyone who speaks up in support of trans people’s rights is grinding. As a disabled woman with fluctuating energy and depression, it was overwhelming, and it was important that people stepping forward understood how tough it can be.”
She added: “The leadership and most of the members of the party are supportive of trans and non-binary rights, with Shirley-Anne Somerville and others being very clear in our support for this vulnerable minority group.”
Six women are standing for the Women’s Convener role – which for the first time will now be separate from the Equalities Convener position.
Five have signed a pledge organised by grassroots LGBTQIA+ pressure group Out For Independence, which commits them, among others things, to being an ally to trans people.
Colette Walker who hasn’t signed the pledge, told The National: “I support LGBT rights but there are real concerns that any male who wants to identify as female to enter female safe spaces, or positions reserved for females or female sports. If Out4Indy offer that reassurance I would be happy to sign.”
Walker is, however, the only candidate to have backed a Women’s Pledge.
The commitment, backed by Cherry, says “women have the right to maintain their sex-based protections as set out in the Equality Act 2010.”
In the conference agenda, the National Secretary Angus MacLeod urges party members to “debate serious policy disagreements in good faith and in a collegial manner.
“There have been occasions this year where that has not been the case and I would urge members to ensure that they do engage constructively and directly with one another,” he added.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel