LORD Fowler, the Lord Speaker, has told Boris Johnson to stop making a "mass" of new peers after choosing to boost the House of Lords' numbers by 36.
Speaking to BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Fowler said: "I do think the Prime Minister has got to stop these kinds of mass appointments because I think the public are unimpressed with it, I think most of us in the House of Lords are unimpressed with it and it is not necessary - we don't need a House of Lords of 830.
"I mean, it is ridiculous because it is far too many for the duties... we have very important duties to carry out in terms of the governance of this country but we don't need 830 people to do it - that's the plain fact and everyone knows that is a fact.
READ MORE: 'Worst kind of cronyism': Boris Johnson's new peer list slammed
"What you are doing is encouraging some in the House of Lords who are quite frankly passengers and don't make much effort in any event."
According to reports, 88 peers - one in nine - have not spoken, held a Government post or participated in a committee, while 46 have never even voted.
Fowler welcomed the peerage given to former Tory chancellor Ken Clarke, however, saying: "The one person I'm delighted who is coming into the House of Lords is Ken Clarke... there is a public servant who has done immense good for this country and is being recognised and actually, if you want someone who will go on taking an active part in politics and in the House of Lords, I think Ken Clarke is the ideal example."
Ruth Davidson, Johnson’s brother, and a newspaper owner were all given cushy jobs for life in the House of Lords yesterday.
The Prime Minister also rewarded the former England cricketer Sir Ian Botham and billionaire Tory donor Michael Spencer.
Theresa May’s husband, Philip, will receive a knighthood for “political services”.
The SNP’s Pete Wishart described it as the “worst kind of cronyism”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel