THE SNP have become embroiled in another row around “transphobia” after a complaint was submitted to its national secretary about a sitting MSP.
Out for Indy, the party’s official LGBT+ wing, said it had submitted a complaint about John Mason, the MSP for Glasgow Shettleston, after he asked the Justice Secretary about the sex of people in Scotland’s women’s prisons.
Speaking in Holyrood on Wednesday, Mason asked the Scottish Government “how many people whose biological sex is male are currently in women’s prisons in Scotland”.
Keith Brown answered that, as of January 21, there had been “five transgender women located in the women’s estate in Scotland”.
Mason said he was grateful for the response, adding: “But does the Cabinet Secretary not think that female offenders, many of whom have suffered violence and sexual assault previously, should be entitled to a single-sex prison?”
READ MORE: Scottish Greens consider cutting ties with English sister party amid transphobia row
Brown said that the Scottish Prison Service, in line with other prison services across the UK, “seeks to make sure that the rights and safety of everyone in prison are looked at when such issues are taken into account”.
Green MSP Maggie Chapman then said: "I must say that there was a very shrill anti-trans dog whistle in John Mason’s question, which is deeply troubling, especially
given the rise in the number of transphobic hate crimes that are being reported."
Following the exchange, Out for Indy announced it would submit a complaint to the SNP’s national secretary, Lorna Finn.
The group accused Mason (below) of “using derogatory, misgendering, transphobic language in clear contravention of the SNP's definition of transphobia as agreed by our NEC”.
The SNP’s definition of transphobia includes a clause prohibiting suggestions that a person’s gender identity is not valid, “for example referring to a trans woman as a biological male”.
It also prohibits: “Accusing wider trans people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single trans person or group or for acts committed by others.”
Out for Indy went on: “This kind of behaviour is unacceptable both in our party and our parliament.
“Not only was John Mason misgendering trans women, he was also further drawing public ire toward some of the most vulnerable people in our society and putting them at risk of harm.
Mr Mason asked a question about trans women in Scottish prisons using derogatory, misgendering, transphobic language in clear contravention of the SNP's definition of transphobia as agreed by our NEC.
— Out for Independence (@OutForIndy) January 26, 2022
🧵 2/5
“Furthermore, the question of the arrangement of prisons, prisoners, and sentencing only serves to reinforce incarceration as the primary tool of justice.
“Mr Mason noted that many women prisoners are survivors of sexual assault. If we truly care about vulnerable women in prisons, we need to re-examine the role prisons play in the justice system and the extent to which they are contributing to women's repeated victimisation.”
Mason told The National that people “need to be able to discuss these issues in a calm and sensible way”.
“There are clearly different views on transgender issues within the SNP and within wider society. So let us encourage respectful debate,” he added.
An SNP spokesperson said they would not comment on internal matters.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel