THE key document which was believed missing in the ferries debacle which explained why the Scottish Government took the risk with the project has been found.
Transport minister Jenny Gilruth said the key email showed “incontrovertible proof” the decision was taken by former minister Derek Mackay.
It was previously held by the Scottish Government that the key document, which outlined why the decision to award the contract to Ferguson Marine Engineering Ltd (FMEL), did not exist.
Nicola Sturgeon had said earlier in the year it was “regrettable” the reasoning behind the key decision had not been recorded properly.
While the email chain, which Gilruth said had been discovered on the computer files of a civil servant who had left the Government “some years ago”, did not go into the reasons Mackay chose to apparently ignore concerns from experts that the Port Glasgow yard did not offer a full builders’ refund and so made the taxpayer liable for the costs of delays and failure to deliver.
Transport minister Jenny Gilruth reveals the discovery of the "key" missing document in ferries saga. She says it discredits opponents' 'conspiracy theories' around the debacle pic.twitter.com/QJUH1iCXWm
— Hamish Morrison (@HMorrison97) May 11, 2022
Audit Scotland has said the documents publish today still fail to answer why the decision was signed off.
But the document shows the decision was ultimately signed off by Mackay during his time as Transport minister.
READ MORE: Labour accused of putting shipbuilding jobs at risk with 'careless' SNP attacks
It also says that Deputy First Minister John Swinney – who remains in that position – had the final say on the contract being awarded.
It was announced by Nicola Sturgeon on August 31, 2015 that FMEL were the preferred bidder.
Gilruth announced the find in Holyrood today.
She said: “This email destroys the opposition’s ridiculous conspiracy theories that another minister made this decision and it destroys their unfounded speculation that there was a ministerial direction given.”
Graham Simpson, the shadow transport secretary, said the email failed to show “why the decision was taken”.
He added: “Nor does it say whether there were discussions between Mr Mackay and Mr [Keith] Brown [Mackay’s senior when the contract was awarded] and Mr Swinney and Ms Sturgeon.”
The key document comes as part of a series of new publications from the Scottish Government today on the awarding of two ferries contracts to FMEL, which are now more than four years late and overbudget by double the original price.
Opposition parties have criticised the SNP for awarding the contract to FMEL despite the reservations of civil servants at CMAL who were concerned the state would be forced to bear the brunt of the costs in the event of delays.
READ MORE: 'Regrettable' key ferry contract records were not properly kept, Nicola Sturgeon says
One email in the chain, from a redacted sender to Mackay’s office, said: “CMAL have concluded contract negotiations with FMEL, having secured some improvements in the terms of the refund guarantees to be provided by the shipyard.
“CMAL’s assessment is that this is the best deal that can be negotiated given FMEL’s financing structure. However, it is clear that the Board of CMAL are still concerned at the risks this contract basis presents in placing orders at FMEL without the full refund guarantees in place that were specified in the original tender documents.
“They are concerned in respect of the position this could leave the company if the ship failed to perform or the shipyard went into liquidation.”
The sender, who has been kept anonymous in the publication, asked the transport minister to confirm he had considered CMAL’s concerns.
Mackay’s private secretary replied to the email the following day saying: “The Minister is content with the proposals and would like to be moved on as quickly as possible please.”
Other emails in the chain confirm the contract was discussed with Swinney before it was announced to CMAL the contract was awarded and that “the absence of banana skins” in the procurement process had been confirmed.
Sturgeon had previously told MSPs the Auditor General had said that the “judgement not been withheld, rather an important piece of documentation was not prepared”.
She added: “So there is one link in the chain that is missing, but you can still very clearly follow the chain of events.”
She also pointed out there were around 200 documents outlining the process for awarding the contract to FMEL in the public domain, totalling around 1500 pages of evidence.
A spokesperson for Audit Scotland said: "The email confirms that ministers approved the award of the FMEL [Ferguson Marine Engineering Limited] contract.
"But there remains insufficient documentary evidence to explain why the decision was made to proceed with the contract, given the significant risks and concerns raised by CMAL."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel