THE UK Government is heading to court in a “desperate” bid to prevent the publication of internal polling on the Union.
In June 2021, the Tory administration was ordered to release the data it had collected on attitudes to Scottish independence by a first-tier tribunal.
The Cabinet Office was ordered to disclose the information requested by the SNP MP Tommy Sheppard under Freedom of Information laws within 28 days after its legal arguments against doing so were judged “not wholly clear”.
However, it has refused to do so, and instead appealed against the judge’s ruling. That appeal will be heard in a tribunal on Tuesday.
READ MORE: UK’s bid to conceal Union poll ‘threatens Freedom of Information Act'
Sheppard said: “It has been almost a year now since the tribunal ruled that the information I requested on secret, tax-payer funded polling into public attitudes towards the Union must be made public, and still they continue to refuse.
“It is clear that the Tories are desperate to hide these results, and the only explanation for this that makes sense is that it does not help their case for keeping Scotland under Westminster control.”
The Edinburgh East MP also pointed to public cash which had been set aside for emergency Covid contracts which the UK Government instead used to poll on attitudes to the Union.
Top Tory Jacob Rees-Mogg insisted the spending had been “completely proper and justifiable”.
Sheppard said: “This is a UK Government that used the money for emergency Covid contracts – from the public purse – to commission political research on constitutional issues, instead of for more PPE or to help doctors and nurses on the front line.
READ MORE: Ten questions for Michael Gove on Covid cash used for Union polling
“The general public deserve to know how and why their money has been misspent – and it should not have had to go to court to make that happen. They should have published the data a year ago after being told to do so by the Information Commissioner. The UK Government must now publish these findings without delay.”
He added: “People are seeing the real cost of living with Westminster on a daily basis now. Every day we wake up to a new story about the Tory cost of living crisis and how millions are struggling because the Chancellor is cruelly failing to lift a finger to help, or new reports of the disastrous consequences of Brexit, or further sleaze, cronyism and corruption engulfing the Westminster government.”
A Cabinet Office spokesperson told The National last week: “The UK Government regularly commissions research across the UK to understand public attitudes and behaviours to inform our campaigns, policies and to ensure we are delivering for people and families across the whole of the United Kingdom.
“The Scottish Government also conducts similar research for the same reasons and we maintain that it is in the public interest to preserve a safe space for the development of policy and the provision of advice to ministers.”
The spokesperson said it would be inappropriate to comment further until the appeal has been heard.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel