CHANCELLOR Rishi Sunak is facing fresh calls to scrap the “unjust” benefit cap, with new figures suggesting the number of those affected by it could rise dramatically next year.
Introduced by the UK Government in 2013, the benefit cap blocks households from receiving the financial assistance they might otherwise be entitled to, and does not rise with inflation.
Official figures show that 120,000 UK households are currently missing out on an average of £2600 a year due to the cap.
Recent analysis by the Child Poverty Action Group (CPAG) found that this figure could rise to more than 150,000 households unless the limit on how much they can receive from social security is increased.
READ MORE: Scot with chronic illnesses tells of battle with UK Government system
While a DWP spokesperson responded by saying the cap is kept under review, they nevertheless defended the measure, saying it “provides a strong work incentive and ensures fairness for hard-working taxpaying households by encouraging people to move into work, where possible.”
Scottish charity the Poverty Alliance – which coordinates the “Scrap the Cap” campaign, supported by more than 100 organisations including Save the Children UK, One Parent Families Scotland and the Trussell Trust – this week wrote to Sunak, calling on him to either end the benefit cap or raise it in line with living costs.
Poverty Alliance director Peter Kelly said: “The benefit cap is completely unjust and should have no place in a compassionate society.
READ MORE: 'I don't know how I can budget anymore': Scots mum hit hard by cost of living crisis
"It cuts the lifeline that people need and are entitled to.
“The present crisis is simply the latest episode of an ongoing injustice, where people’s incomes have fallen and the social security net that we all rely on has been deliberately cut, with the benefit cap being just one example.
“The very least the Chancellor can do is to make sure that the cap is raised in line with the real cost of living.
"Better still, he should find the courage and compassion to scrap the cap altogether.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here