BORIS Johnson will not be permitted to use the Prime Minister’s country house for a planned “champagne-soaked” bash to celebrate his wedding, according to reports.
The Prime Minister, who remains in post since announcing his resignation on Thursday, was said to be clinging on to the premiership to throw a swanky bash to celebrate the one-year anniversary of their nuptials.
But a Government source has now confirmed the party will not be going ahead.
They told the BBC that “nothing had been 100% firmed up” but that an alternative venue would be used.
READ MORE: Ben Wallace early favourite as Tory leadership race gets unofficially underway
The couple were married last year but said they were unable to celebrate properly due to Covid restrictions.
Retaining access to Chequers was reportedly a key reason the Prime Minister wanted to remain in post.
James Cleverley, who was appointed Education Secretary yesterday in what some are calling Johnson’s “caretaker” Government, had suggested the next Prime Minister should respect the Johnsons’ wishes and allow the wedding to go ahead – even if Johnson is no longer Prime Minister.
Questioned about the reports on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, Cleverley said: “I think that if that is done by that point in time, I suspect that it would be a rather generous action of the new prime minister to allow that to go ahead.
“Private functions like that do not impose a burden on the public purse…
“I think it’s churlish to be negative about two people who want to celebrate their marriage and their love for each other.”
READ MORE: BBC 'depicts false balance' of Scots' views on Boris Johnson's resignation
A report in the Evening Standard’s gossip column, published before the Prime Minister was brought crashing down by Tory MPs, reported the couple were planning “a champagne-soaked soirée at Chequers” in the summer.
The Sun reported the party will be held on July 30 – by which time Johnson may have departed No 10.
One source told the paper: "It beggars belief that even after all the criticism Johnson has faced regarding integrity and probity, one of the reasons he is staying is to have his wedding party at Chequers.
“The Johnsons should do the decent thing and find a different venue."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel