ROYAL correspondent Nicholas Witchell has been accused of providing the BBC with a “crass monologue” on Scottish independence during its coverage of the Queen’s thanksgiving service.
Witchell spent some time last Thursday discussing what the Union meant to the Queen as she was under medical supervision at Balmoral.
On Monday, as King Charles and the Queen Consort travelled to Edinburgh for the service at St Giles’ Cathedral, the reporter took the opportunity to explain the royal family’s views on the Union for around four minutes.
Unchallenged by the BBC News host, Witchell argued that the Queen was privately “greatly distressed” about the possibility of an independent Scotland and promoted the “advantages” of being united.
Nicholas Witchell provides four minutes of pro-Union commentary on behalf of the royal family, unchallenged by the BBC presenter. pic.twitter.com/tr2qKcR9BX
— The National (@ScotNational) September 12, 2022
It comes as both Holyrood and Westminster have had their business shut down, and political parties suspend campaigning, as a mark of respect to the late Queen Elizabeth.
Witchell told viewers that while the SNP’s official policy would be to maintain the monarchy after Scotland becomes independent, there are people within the party and wider movement who would prefer a republic. He says this is a “challenge” for both the Union and the monarchy itself.
“It is something that the Queen privately did feel strongly about,” the journalist said. “She was greatly distressed at the thought of the Union dividing, at the thought of Scotland leaving the Union.”
READ MORE: Man arrested after shouting abuse at Prince Andrew during Royal Mile procession for the Queen
After discussing the Queen’s 2014 independence intervention, Witchell said: “It is undoubtedly the case that the whole question of the monarchy in Scotland is something about which a lot of thought is given at Buckingham Palace.
“The Duke of Rothesay, as he’s known in Scotland or has been known until now … but yeah the family and William too, I think, feels very strongly about the importance of the Union.
“All the advantages that the nation as a whole has from being united.”
Chris McEleny, the general secretary of Alex Salmond’s Alba party, was critical of Witchell and the BBC’s approach to the political matter.
“Nicholas Witchell has made a career out of making things up or coming to assumptions in regards to the thoughts of others,” said the former councillor. “His latest intervention being a long monologue on the late Queen’s thoughts on the Union that ‘she kept to herself’ but somehow Nicholas Witchell thinks he knows what they were.
“It is pretty crass to use the Queen to make a political point, especially on the BBC.
“The Union of Crowns predates the Union of Scotland and England. Queen Elizabeth knew this, sadly the BBC’s chief royal fabricator does not. He should take the earliest opportunity to apologise.”
The BBC have been contacted for comment.
READ MORE: BBC slammed over John Knox 'cleared Catholics out of Scotland' comment
During his contribution to the coverage, Witchell referred to William feeling “strongly” about the Union.
While William has also not spoken publicly on the issue of independence, he and wife Kate held a private meeting with Gordon Brown last year. The former prime minister had, at the time, just launched a renewed anti-independence think tank Our Scottish Future.
Kensington Palace said Prince William had been listening to community views on the independence issue.
It was also briefed in 2021 that Queen Elizabeth would be leading a royal “charm offensive” to save the Union after the SNP’s victory at the Holyrood election.
Officials at Number 10 had held discussions about how to use "cultural bonds" to help to tie Scotland more closely to London, with the royals thought to be one of their most powerful tools to assist with that plan.
Before the 2014 independence referendum the Queen said Scots should "think carefully about the future".
Her comment was seen to influence the final 55%-45% result against independence.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel