SNP MSP Ash Regan has released a statement explaining her “difficult” decision to quit as a Scottish Government minister over the GRA Bill.
The Edinburgh Eastern representative suddenly stepped down from her role as community safety minister before MSPs debated the first stage of the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill on Thursday night.
In her resignation letter to the First Minister, she said her “conscience” could not allow her to back the proposed changes.
Responding to the former minister, Nicola Sturgeon said Regan had never approached her or the Social Justice Secretary to raise concerns around Gender Recognition Reform or the whipped vote.
READ MORE: RECAP: Updates from Holyrood as GRA debate leads to minister's resignation
After the vote overwhelmingly passed – by 88 for yes to 33 for no, with four abstentions – Regan put out a longer comment on why she made her decision.
She said: “I have today taken the difficult decision to resign from my position as minister for community safety as my conscience would not allow me to vote with the Government this evening. I have greatly valued my time in government and regret that I am not able to continue that work.
“I voted against the Gender Recognition Reform Bill at stage one as the issues of concern that I have held and raised for some time have not been addressed as yet.
“I am not against reform per se, however, I cannot support any legislation that may have negative implications for the safety and dignity of women and girls.
“I have long believed that principles in politics are important and that is the case especially when it is difficult.
“I will continue to support my constituents as their representative and continue to make the strong case for Scottish independence.”
A total of seven SNP MSPs broke with the whip to vote against the bill: Stephanie Callaghan, Fergus Ewing, Kenneth Gibson, Ruth Maguire, John Mason, Michelle Thomson and Regan.
Two SNP MSPs abstained, Annabelle Ewing and Jim Fairlie.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel