A TORY MSP has warned the Prime Minister that the blocking of Scotland’s Gender Recognition Reform Bill would be a “gift to proponents of independence”.
Rishi Sunak is reportedly considering legal advice about whether or not to use UK powers to block the bill which was passed last month by a majority of MSPs.
MSP for the West Scotland region Jamie Greene broke from his party to back gender reform in Scotland.
In a letter to the Prime Minister, seen by The Times, he said: “I fear the UK Government’s rumoured moves to block the Scottish Gender Recognition Reform Bill will set us back years.
READ MORE: It's hypocrisy to back both Yes and the Tories blocking gender reform
“This move could be a gift to proponents of independence who may accuse us of tearing up the devolution settlement.
“It could be a gift to Labour, as we show to LGBT+ people, their friends and their families, that we are happy to leave the centre ground for others as we fail to live up to our promise to govern with compassion.”
This comes as Labour leader Keir Starmer faces backlash from within his own party after he said he had “concerns” about gender reform in Scotland – despite Labour MSPs supporting the legislation at Holyrood.
The deadline for Rishi Sunak to decide whether to block Scotland’s gender laws will arrive on Wednesday.
Greene said that it was not “unConservative” to support the bill and added: “We must not treat trans people as political football.
“Make no mistake. This could also fuel accusations of riding roughshod over devolution. It may also give the SNP-led Scottish Government the welcome gift of a fight.”
Speaking to the BBC on Sunday, SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn said he would rather there was no “clash” on the issue as the most important thing was dealing with the impact on trans rights.
Starmer was also asked if he would block the Scottish legislation if he were prime minister and he said he would wait to see what legal advice the UK Government received.
During his visit to Scotland last week, Sunak spoke about the concern he had over the changes the legislation would enact.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel