A WOMAN has told the Sheku Bayoh inquiry of her “traumatic nightmare experience” as she and her family were made to vacate their house by police officers who told them it was being treated as a crime scene.
Saadia Rashid said police told her they did not need a warrant to search the property and she was left feeling she had no choice but to leave.
Bayoh, 31, a father-of-two, died after he was restrained on the ground by six police officers in Kirkcaldy, Fife, on May 3 2015.
The inquiry is investigating the circumstances of his death and whether race was a factor.
READ MORE: Kadi Johnson: 10 things that changed my life
Rashid told the inquiry on Wednesday that two officers initially arrived at her mother’s house, where she was staying, at around 8am on Sunday May 3 and told her they were looking for her brother, and they left when she said he was not there.
She said that around an hour later, a number of uniformed officers came to the house along with one in a suit who told her the family needed to vacate the house as officers were looking for evidence and had to search the house.
The witness said no explanation was given as to why officers needed to search the property.
Angela Grahame KC, lead counsel to the inquiry, asked: “What was your response?”
Rashid replied: “I asked for a warrant. He didn’t have one.”
Grahame took her through her statement to the inquiry, saying: “You say ‘they said they didn’t need a warrant, that we had to vacate now, they said we didn’t have a choice and we had to let them in because this was a crime scene and they had to seal the house and search the house’.”
The KC asked whether any explanation was given as to why the house was considered a crime scene, to which Rashid replied: “No.”
The witness said she explained to officers that she could not leave as another of her brothers, a paralysed war veteran, was in a wheelchair and she and her elderly mother could not move him on their own, and she also had two young children, aged two months and one-and-a-half.
However she said the officers did not offer any assistance and did nothing to help.
READ MORE: Police could have been ‘more honest’ with Sheku Bayoh death message
She told the inquiry that she then packed “in panic mode”, feeling rushed, and later discovered she had left things behind including breast pumps, expressed milk and medication.
Rashid said officers told her she could not go back into the house to collect them.
She said the family were treated with no compassion and the experience left them feeling like “second-class citizens”.
Grahame referred the witness to her statement to the inquiry in which she described how during the course of the day “news of Shek had spread all over town”, but she could not understand how this related to her family home.
She told the inquiry she was not aware of anything that would connect Mr Bayoh to the house.
She said: “What did Shek’s death have to do with our house, why were we being thrown out of our house, what were they looking for in our house, what were they searching for that could possibly have to do with Shek’s death?”
Rashid said she had come to her mother’s house for rest after an emergency C-section when her baby was born and instead that day endured a “traumatic, nightmare experience that was uncalled for”.
In her inquiry statement she also said the family “felt almost like we were being treated differently because we were Pakistani and Muslims”.
Asked by Grahame what it was about the officers’ behaviour that made her feel this way, Rashid said: “The fact that we were Muslims and wearing hijab, we were quite vulnerable at the time, had that been anyone else they would have been treated differently.”
She said she thinks they may have been treated with more compassion if they had been someone else.
The inquiry later heard from Rashid’s father Saeed Ahmed, who came to the house to help after his daughter rang to tell him what was happening.
He said police initially would not let him into the house even though he told them he was a carer for his son, a former paratrooper who was injured serving with the British Army in Iraq around 2002.
Police eventually let him in after some discussion amongst officers.
The inquiry, before Lord Bracadale in Edinburgh, continues.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article