MHAIRI Black has accused Kate Forbes of “intolerance” because of her stance on equal marriage – saying the Finance Secretary had “alienated swathes” of voters.
In a full-throated attack on Forbes, the party’s deputy leader in Westminster said: “Kate hasn’t just jeopardised a lot of activists and members, she has alienated swathes of the population before she’s even started.
"We need, and should expect, better judgement, communication, and leadership skills if we are to ever convince others of independence.”
A lot of people have asked me my views of the leadership contest. Truthfully, I have been incredibly hurt so far. Hurt originating with the statements @_KateForbes has made and since stood by. I, like most people in Scotland, could not care less about someone’s religion. (1/10)
— Mhairi Black MP🏳️🌈 (@MhairiBlack) February 24, 2023
In a lengthy Twitter thread responding to Forbes saying she would have voted against same-sex marriage had she been an MSP at the time.
READ MORE: Kate Forbes takes early lead in poll of SNP voters' leadership preference
The Paisley MP said she doubted Forbes had the "judgement, communication, and leadership skills" to convince voters of the case for independence and attacked suggestions the scrutiny faced by the Finance Secretary were a "unionist media plot" as being "utterly fanciful at best and a dangerous conspiracy theory at worst".
She wrote: A lot of people have asked me my views of the leadership contest. Truthfully, I have been incredibly hurt so far. Hurt originating with the statements [Forbes] has made and since stood by. I, like most people in Scotland, could not care less about someone’s religion.
"If your faith says you cannot drink alcohol, then don’t. If your religion says you cannot enter same sex marriage, then don’t. If your religion does not allow for abortion, then do not have one.
"However, the moment you use your religion to justify voting against me having access to any of the above, then it is you who is showing intolerance.
"What you practice in your own time, and how you subscribe to live your life is your business, but as a lawmaker, if you choose to allow your religion to try and deny me my basic human rights, then *you* make it my business.
"The idea that Kate is being ‘persecuted’, or that there is a ‘witch hunt’ or ‘unionist media plot’ against her is utterly fanciful at best and a dangerous conspiracy theory at worst.
READ MORE: Ash Regan would 'lead minority SNP government' if Greens left Bute House deal
"Holding candidates to account, and scrutinising what they have said themselves - on camera, voluntarily, as a pitch to be the next FM of Scotland - is not abuse.
"Had a candidate said they do not believe in racially mixed marriages we would rightly be horrified - so why is my marriage still considered fair game?
"How I, and others, are expected to have faith in a leader who unashamedly and publicly believes the love between my wife and I should not be legally recognised, is beyond me.
"Where there has since been shallow calls for, and promises of tolerance made, I find myself thinking of what Humza has said and understood for years: I don’t want to be tolerated, I want to be equal.
"Kate hasn’t just jeopardised a lot of activists and members, she has alienated swathes of the population before she’s even started. We need, and should expect, better judgement, communication, and leadership skills if we are to ever convince others of independence."
Forbes came out in front of a snap poll of SNP voters - but most say they do not know who they think should take over.
A survey of the party’s supporters, commissioned by communications agency The BIG Partnership, found 31% are undecided over who they want to see as Nicola Sturgeon’s successor.
Forbes leads among those who have an opinion, with 28% saying they would support her - followed by Yousaf on 20% and Ash Regan on 7%.
A spokesperson for Forbes's campaign declined to comment.
Writing on Twitter on Thursday, Forbes said she felt "heartsore" her views on LGBT rights had hurt people.
She said: "I will protect the rights of everybody in Scotland, particularly minorities, to live and to love without fear or harassment in a pluralistic and tolerant society. I will uphold the laws that have been hard won, as a servant of democracy."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel