JOANNA Cherry has said Peter Murrell is “very lucky” not to have been suspended from the SNP pending the result of the investigation into SNP finances.
Writing in The National, the SNP MP complained that it is not “fair” or “in accordance with the principles of natural justice” that others have not been granted the same “leniency” from the party.
Following the former SNP CEO’s arrest and subsequent release last week, he was not suspended by the party.
However, Cherry writes, the likes of Michelle Thomson did see their membership suspended due to a police probe.
Thomson (below), now the SNP MSP for Falkirk East, was suspended while serving as an MP as police looked into “alleged irregularities” around property dealings – Thomson denied wrongdoing and there were no criminal proceedings.
Elsewhere, Cherry said currency commentator Tim Rideout had been suspended for six months over an “ill-judged tweet”, before saying gender critical women have been kicked out of the party for “exercising their right to freedom of belief and freedom of speech”.
“This difference in approach is neither fair, nor in accordance with the principles of natural justice. In some cases it might even amount to unlawful discrimination,” she alleged.
“The anomalies in how the SNP complaints and disciplinary process has been applied are part of a much wider problem with the party’s management which is now in the public domain because of recent events,” she added.
Elsewhere in the column, Cherry argued that she wants to “save the SNP” amid the current transparency issues – but said this is not a short-term problem.
“There are still many people in the SNP and wider movement that seem to see the current mess as a wrinkle to be gotten over and who are keen to point out that our scandals aren’t as bad those of other parties,” she wrote.
“Many people have been wheeshting for indy for so long that it is hard to break from that mindset.
“So, in protecting the cause of independence, I also want to save the SNP, but this can only be done if we look at what has gone wrong, how it was able to go wrong and make sure it can never happen again.”
The SNP have been contacted for comment.
Joanna’s full column is available to read here
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article