HOLIDAYMAKERS flying out of one of Scotland’s busiest airports could face travel chaos, a union has warned as security staff up the stakes in their pay battle.
Around 250 workers who are employed by ICTS at Glasgow Airport have rejected what Unite described as a “derisory” 5% pay offer, the union said on Wednesday.
Pat McIlvogue, Unite regional industrial officer, said the offer “represents a massive pay cut in real-terms”.
He added: “Unless the company improves upon its current offer, then Glasgow Airport faces a summer of travel chaos because it simply can’t operate safely and efficiently without these essential workers.
“We are encouraging ICTS to heed the warning before this dispute escalates potentially to strike action.”
READ MORE: Give Us Space: The National's campaign backing buffer zones
Some 94% of its members rejected the 5% rise, Unite said.
The union said it will have no option but to move towards an industrial ballot of its members if employers do not improve the offer.
The airport staff involved are central search workers who deal with passengers directly in the security search area and process them for flights.
The workers also cover mobile patrols, control access posts, screen all deliveries and deal with emergency services at the airport, which sees more than 9.9 million passengers go through its doors every year.
ICTS and Glasgow Airport have been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here