A FORMER head of the Foreign Office has insisted Britain has reached the “end of the game” as a global superpower, insisting its decline on the world stage has been “absolute and relative”.
Simon McDonald, who spent 40 years in the Foreign Office, told the New Statesman the UK is now “mostly a soft power player” and does not have the resources to back up the “hard power game” it’s "still trying to play".
He even said the fact the UK had been the first to supply weapons to Ukraine was still “in the soft power side of life” and insisted Britain would now not have the resources to carry out an operation the size of the Falklands War – an event he entered the Foreign Office on the eve of. For example, it now has fewer than 40 warships when it had almost 100 in 1982.
McDonald said Britain’s global decline has been "both absolute and relative. India, China, Japan, Brazil, Australia – they all count for more than they did 20 years ago."
READ MORE: Scotland 'can never' exist again, says Scottish LibDems leader
He said: “We can still be a player, but I think we are mostly a soft power player.
“The problem is that Britain is still trying to play a hard power game, but we don’t have the resources to back that up anymore.”
Asked about Britain’s role in helping Ukraine face up to the Russian invasion, he added: “These all to me feel in the soft power side of life: to draw other people’s attention to something, to galvanise activity.”
Asked if it was the end of the “great game” for Britain, he said: “Yes.”
He said the Falklands showed the UK “doing something by itself, without American approval” and British foreign policy since had been defined by the UK’s eagerness to act in America’s slipstream.
He said for a long time that was balanced by the UK’s role in Europe, but now it has left the EU, McDonald said “our strategic choice has boiled down to one country”.
In the interview, McDonald also blasted the UK’s involvement in the Iraq War saying: “So many people died, for what purpose?”
As an official, McDonald put together a paper suggesting UK withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2010, which did not actually happen until a decade later. He said: “I don’t believe anything extra was achieved by prolonging our stay.”
In the interview, McDonald was also critical of recent foreign secretaries. He said Liz Truss spent a “massive amount of time” on her image and highlighted how ministers without any experience were now being propelled into great offices of state at worrying speeds.
“When I started [in 1981], your typical minister had served quite a long apprenticeship, coming into cabinet with a lot of miles on the clock. Now you can be foreign secretary within a few years of entering parliament,” he said.
On Truss, McDonald added: “Liz Truss spent a massive amount of time on her image. Her social media feeds were something that she curated all the time.
“She was nurturing the audience that eventually voted her to the leadership of the Conservative Party. Maybe as a cabinet minister you should be deeper into the policy implications rather than thinking, ‘I’m in Sydney, what’s the best photograph?’”
McDonald, 62, became known for helping to bring down Boris Johnson last year, when he released a public letter which contradicted Number 10’s account of how much the former prime minister knew about allegations of misconduct by Chris Pincher prior to appointing him as chief whip.
He knew Pincher had been subject to an investigation in 2019 and that Johnson had been briefed about it.
“I was telling a truth no one else could tell authoritatively,” said McDonald.
“For some reason, No 10 decided to say, ‘There’s nothing here. There is nothing to know. And if there is something to know, the prime minister doesn’t know it.’
“The truth matters, and No 10 had forgotten that.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel