OPPOSITION parties have demanded the shredding of Boris Johnson’s resignation honours list, after Rishi Sunak accepted his peerage recommendations.
The Times reported that the Prime Minister is expected to accept Johnson’s long-awaited resignation honours list, with the paper reporting that it could be published in a matter of weeks.
According to a Whitehall source quoted by the newspaper, Sunak is hoping to “clear the decks” by signing off the awards, which are said to have been a source of contention between the two figures.
The Prime Minister was asked about the reports during his trip to the US and said he could not comment on his predecessor’s submission.
Liberal Democrat deputy leader Daisy Cooper accused Sunak of rewarding “failure” by allegedly giving the list the green light.
Cooper said: “The fact that one of the most scandal-ridden prime ministers is now allowed to stuff his cronies in the Lords after a failed premiership tells the British public everything they need to know about this Conservative Party.
READ MORE: Keith Brown accuses Scottish Tories of 'tarnishing' parliament
“Boris Johnson caused crisis after crisis in this country — if Rishi Sunak rewards his failure, it’s just proof it is one rule for the Conservatives and another for everyone else.
“The buck stops with Sunak — he must ensure that Johnson’s honours list is put through the shredder.”
The Prime Minister remained tight-lipped about whether he had accepted the nominations list, which is said to contain about 50 names, when quizzed in Washington DC on Thursday.
He said: “I can completely understand the interest in this topic.
“All I can say is there is a process that is currently under way. It has not concluded yet and until it does, it would not be right for me to comment any further.
Keir Starmer suggested the Tory party leader was having to “appease different bits” of the governing party with his handling of the honours roll.
In a visit to a steelworks in Scunthorpe, he said: “Whether it’s Boris Johnson’s WhatsApp messages, Boris Johnson’s peerages, all the Prime Minister is doing is managing his own party instead of running the country.”
There are suggestions that the list could spark at least two by-elections in England for the Conservatives.
Early electoral battles could be held in the seats of former culture secretary Nadine Dorries and Alok Sharma, president of the COP26 climate summit in Glasgow.
Sharma holds a 4000-vote majority of Labour in his Reading West constituency and Dorries, who has announced her intention to resign in Mid Bedfordshire, has a majority of more than 24,600.
Scottish secretary Alister Jack is also reportedly set to be offered a peerage by Johnson.
The Cabinet Minister has announced he will stand down at the next national poll but has ruled out triggering a by-election in his Dumfries and Galloway constituency to take up a seat in the House of Lords before then.
READ MORE: Scots diaspora ready to support trade, says former US Congress staffer
Dorries said she has not been told whether she is on the former prime minister’s honours list.
Speaking on her TalkTV programme last month, Dorries said: “Apparently the House of Lords Appointment Committee has said that would be ‘constitutionally improper’.
The former culture secretary said the committee “need probably to update their processes” due to the UK being in “politically unstable times” after having three No 10 incumbents in a matter of months last year.
Johnson’s spokesman said: “We strictly do not comment on honours.”
Former prime minister Liz Truss, despite being the shortest serving prime minister in modern British political history, has also reportedly submitted a short resignation honours list.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here