NORTH of Tyne mayor Jamie Driscoll has resigned from Labour after being blocked by the party from running for another role in England's north east.
The left-wing figure hoped to be elected as the first mayor of the North East Combined Authority, which will bring together County Durham, Gateshead, South Tyneside and Sunderland - but he claimed the party leadership blocked his candidacy without offering an explanation.
Driscoll will now seek to stand as an independent in the mayoralty contest for the expanded authority.
He said in a statement: “Millions of people feel the parties in Westminster don’t speak for them.
“They want decisions made closer to home – and not by people who are controlled by party HQs in London.”
READ MORE: Anas Sarwar in unbelievable excuse for Labour's two-child benefit U-turn
Driscoll accused Sir Keir Starmer of breaking his promise to bring people together.
In his resignation letter to the Labour leader, the left-leaning North of Tyne mayor wrote: “Given you have barred me from running as North East mayor, despite being incumbent mayor, I have no other choice.
“In 2020 you told me to my face that you would ‘inspire people to come together … disciplining people to be united is going nowhere.’ You’ve broken that promise.
READ MORE: Keir Starmer faces fierce criticism following 'painful' BBC interview
“You’ve U-turned on so many promises: £28 billion to tackle the climate emergency, free school meals, ending university tuition fees, reversing NHS privatisation; in fact, a list of broken promises too long to repeat in this letter.
“Please stop saying ‘I make no apologies for…’ before you find yourself saying ‘I make no apologies for making no apologies’.
“It is not grown-up politics to say Britain is broken, and then claim things are now so difficult we will abandon any plan to fix it. That is mental gymnastics worthy of Olympic gold.”
I’ve decided to resign from @UKLabour and serve as an Independent Mayor.
— Mayor Jamie Driscoll (@MayorJD) July 17, 2023
People are tired of being controlled by Westminster and Party HQs. They want someone to stand up for them. Let the people decide. £25k by end of Aug & I’ll stand as North East Mayor👉https://t.co/WuDEGd3xxJ pic.twitter.com/kscPeMmlX5
He went on: “Worst of all, you’ve said you’re not interested in hope and change. Well, I am – Britain needs hope and change.
“Instead of London Labour HQ barring me from running, you could have used my work as a showcase of economic competence.“
Driscoll said his work in England’s north east has seen 5000 new jobs delivered, investment in renewable energy and a Child Poverty Prevention Programme brought in – without increasing council tax payments.
“I’ve done this by being pragmatic and putting results ahead of party politics,” said the mayor, promoting praise from across party lines.
“I think I’ve shown that hope and change is not only possible – but that it’s pragmatic, common sense response to the challenges of our time. This is not a time for faint hearts. It’s a time for bravery. Shy bairns get nowt.”
Driscoll promised to run in the North East contest if he raises £25,000 via a crowdfunder by the end of August.
At the time Driscoll was blocked, a senior Labour source linked the decision to the mayor sharing a panel with filmmaker Ken Loach (below), who was expelled from the party amid efforts to root out antisemitism from the party.
But figures on the left of the party blamed “factionalism” under Starmer's leadership, before trade union chiefs accused it of a “monumental own goal”.
Responding to his exit, a Labour spokesperson said: “The Labour Party is delighted that local party members have selected Kim McGuinness as our candidate for the North East mayoral election next year.
“With Keir Starmer as leader, the Labour Party is a changed party, relentlessly focussed on delivering for working people, and we make no apologies that Labour candidates are held to the highest standard.
“The Tories have let our region down, and as Labour mayor, Kim will be the strong voice the North East deserves.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel