A LABOUR MP has accused the SNP of “Sinophobia and misogyny” after comparing her party’s support for cruel Tory benefit rules to the Chinese Communist Party’s draconian child limit policy.
Labour’s Sarah Owen, the first MP of south-east Asian descent, took aim at SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn for the mugs and accompanying notes handed to journalists in Westminster on Wednesday morning.
Photos posted on social media showed a note, on House of Commons paper from Flynn, reading: “The Labour Party has a new range of mugs in production. They’re made in China – just like Sir Keir Starmer’s latest policy.”
The slogans “Controls on family sizes” and “What’s the point of Labour?” were written on the mug.
READ MORE: Stephen Flynn targets Labour in genius pre-PMQs stunt
The comments echo those made by Scottish Labour’s deputy leader Jackie Baillie, who made the same comparison while speaking against the two-child benefit cap in 2018.
Flynn used Prime Minister’s Questions to criticise the opposition for its plan to maintain the two-child benefit cap, which prevents parents from claiming Universal Credit or child tax credit for a third or additional child born after April 2017.
China’s one-child policy, implemented nationwide in 1980, sought to limit most Chinese families to one child each to limit population growth. It ended in 2016.
Owen, raising a point of order in the Commons, told deputy speaker Eleanor Laing: “Earlier this morning a note on parliamentary headed notepaper and mug was sent to the press lobby from the SNP leader in Westminster referring to China’s one-child policy.
“This was not what I came to Parliament to do but sadly I’ve become used to calling out Sinophobia and misogyny in this place and would be grateful for your guidance.
“Official statistics confirm that as a result of the one-child policy there were 196 million sterilisations, 336m abortions, all under China’s one-child policy.
“It was a policy that broke families, led to infanticide, mostly baby girls – in 2017, there were still 33m more men than there were women in China.
“When can our diverse communities expect better from members of Parliament, especially in understanding the history and trauma of other countries?
“Madam Deputy Speaker, is it really appropriate for the SNP leader in Westminster to use parliamentary stationery to make crass political jibes steeped in Sinophobia and misogyny?
READ MORE: Rishi Sunak welcomes Labour's 'newfound support' for cruel Tory benefit cap
“Shouldn’t we expect better, especially the south-east Asian community, on this issue?”
SNP MP Martin Docherty-Hughes, MP for West Dunbartonshire, also made a point of order to ask the deputy speaker: “Maybe you can clarify two points for me.
“Whether or not the British Labour Party is more rattled by a minor breach of the rules than they are by child poverty?
“And also, in terms of quotes, I believe in 2018 the following was said: ‘The cap reminds me of communist China’s morally abhorrent one-child policy. Now even the Chinese have abolished that, perhaps the Tories can bring themselves to follow China’s example and abolish the two-child cap.’
“The deputy leader of the Scottish Labour Party [Jackie Baillie] said that.
“So maybe in answering these two questions maybe we can find the member for Luton North the telephone number for Labour’s sub-branch office in Glasgow.”
The deputy speaker, in her reply, said: “I would urge responsible language in this House and by members outside this house.”
She also advised Owen to write to Speaker Lindsay Hoyle if she had concerns over how parliamentary stationery had been used.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel