A COLOSSAL solar farm development – the size of 120 football pitches – has been given the green light for a village in Dumfries and Galloway.
The renewable energy development at High Nunton Farm, near Borgue, has split the community and was approved on a very slim margin last week.
At Dumfries and Galloway Council’s planning committee, councillors were also split on whether or not to approve the plans.
Land owner Robert Maitland submitted a planning application for the installation of nearly 45,000 solar panels on metal arrays, along with a battery storage facility for renewable energy on a 49-hectare piece of agricultural land.
The solar farm will also include associated equipment, such as an energy storage container, communications cabin with tower and customer substation, temporary works compound, security fencing, and CCTV cameras on three-metre high poles.
READ MORE: Future looking bright for cycling in Scottish Borders
The council received 27 objections to the proposal, primarily from people who live in Borgue, while 29 people sent in letters of support from various addresses in the region – but also London, Liverpool and Edinburgh.
Numerous residents attended last week’s planning committee meeting to share their views and hopefully sway the opinion of councillors.
Howard Davison criticised the council planning officer’s assessment of the application, listing 10 areas where alternative points of view and important information were “not properly considered.”
He added: “His assertion that a solar farm the size of up to 120 football pitches – with mitigation planting – would still appear largely as an agricultural landscape lacks any credibility.”
Russell Malloch raised objections next, saying: “The High Nunton proposal is significantly contrary to many of the relevant policies in the local development plan and NPF4 (National Planning Framework).
“The application must be refused, not least because the environmental impact assessment, on which the officer has based his recommendations, is incorrect and incomplete.
“The officer has failed in particular to address the material information that has been withheld by the applicant for the purpose of procuring a favourable decision.”
READ MORE: Police probe 'unexplained' death in Mull of Galloway
Mark Parry, who lives near Dalbeattie and has known the applicant Robert Maitland for over 15 years, spoke in support of the solar farm development.
He told the committee: “I have visited his property on a number of occasions. I have been impressed by the manner in which he has built up his business over a number of years.
“You are receiving an application from an individual – not a corporation – who has poured bucketloads of time, energy, and funding over an 11-year period into a vision from which he obviously stands to benefit, but will have a far more ranging impact through the provision of green energy.”
Tom Woof, the planning agent representing Maitland, said: “The project will have the capacity to generate nearly 30 million units of electricity per year – enough to supply the annual electrical load of around 8000 homes.
“This is entirely in tune with the new policy which has been taken by the council, Scotland, the UK, and global governance bodies.”
Annandale East and Eskdale Councillor Archie Dryburgh proposed that the planning committee back the council officer’s recommendation and approve the solar farm development.
Meanwhile, Stranraer and the Rhins Councillor called for it to be rejected.
The vote between councillors was tied 9-9 – with two councillors abstaining. Committee chairman, Councillor Jim Dempster, used his casting vote to approve the application.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel