A MULTI-MILLION pound development which will transform part of Glasgow’s skyline has been given the green light.
Councillors on the city’s planning committee have approved proposals to build a 17-storey Aparthotel in the heart of the city centre.
The edifice will rise from a site on the corner of Cambridge Street and Renfrew Street, behind the old Littlewoods store, which is currently occupied by a derelict building.
Glasgow City Council's planning committee approved the plan on Tuesday morning.
Developers say the aparthotel, which would be visible across the city, “will support the economy of the city and its strong tourist industry” and bring people into Glasgow’s premier shopping area.
READ MORE: Sauchiehall Street revamp to start this month
Council sources had said the plan was a ‘vote of confidence’ by investors towards Glasgow.
Aparthotels combine air BnB-style accommodation within a classic hotel structure. The building, which is being proposed by Derby-based PMI Developments and Peveril Securities, would have a lounge and bar along with staff offices and laundry rooms.
It would contain 160 units, made up of single rooms and studio apartments.
However, dozens of people living nearby objected to the plan, with a letter-writing campaign organised in Garnethill.
Residents said the tower will overshadow their properties and is out of keeping with other buildings in the area, which is part of a conservation zone.
The local community council has also voiced fears about air pollution created during the building’s construction.
Other objectors include the Architectural Heritage Society of Scotland’s Strathclyde Group.
The current building on the site – a four storey, flat-roofed concrete structure – has been unoccupied for a number of years.
Developers say that the aparthotel will enhance the area and provide an “outstanding, and distinctive architectural character” to an area blighted by neglect.
Their planning application states: “The proposed development will bring significant investment to the Sauchiehall Street area, on a long-term vacant site.
“We believe the current building detracts from the locale and does not provide any supervision of a key route along Cambridge Street.
“We believe we have responded to feedback where possible. During the course of the planning application, we would be pleased to maintain engagement with the local community and any other interested parties.”
READ MORE: Decision to be made on 17-storey aparthotel that could transform Glasgow skyline
The planning statement adds: “It is acknowledged there are a few nearby residents who remain of the view the proposal by virtue of its height will impact their properties.
“However, we have sought to demonstrate, within the context of planning policy, that the proposal has been carefully designed in such a way that we believe it will provide an outstanding, and distinctive architectural character that imaginatively responds to its Glasgow context.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel